rududu video codec [Archive]

gino25

26th April 2003, 17:05

Some time ago rududu mede this codec.

Do anyone know if there will be a never version of this (good but with some bugs) codec?

I' ve tried to send a email to rodudu but he have not reaply.

Sorry for my bad english

Sirber

26th April 2003, 19:39

It's seems dead.

Tommy Carrot

26th April 2003, 20:35

Yes, it would be great if the colorspace problems and the multiple_of_64 limit would be fixed. I don't think these are hard to do, and the codec would be very good at low bitrates.

Sirber

26th April 2003, 21:25

He didn't post the sources.

For low bitrates, RV9 is quite good. :D

ChristianHJW

26th April 2003, 22:12

Nicolas is still subscribed to both matroska MLs, but in fact he hasnt actively participated in the discussion since a couple of weeks ...

26th April 2003, 22:23

Originally posted by Sirber
For low bitrates, RV9 is quite good. :D
Damn, you're worse than Christian, and you're not even pimping your own product.

Sirber

26th April 2003, 22:41

lol

A good one :)

gino25

27th April 2003, 11:22

If autor posts sources the codec may become open-source.

Why do we contact rududu by email to ask this?
The dovelopment may continue....

@sirber
Does rv9 use wavelets?

Sirber

27th April 2003, 17:39

I don't know. Karl never told me. It's kinda secret :)

CaptainCarrot

27th April 2003, 22:44

I don't know. Karl never told me. It's kinda secret
Well, Karl did :D. First paragraph of the first post of Real Video sticky. There he says:

...[rv9] is not open source, not based on wavelets, and not on fractals, does not include inherent pre-filtering...

Sirber

27th April 2003, 23:28

So... if I fellow your logic... what technology are they using? :p

TheXung

28th April 2003, 06:14

Originally posted by Sirber
So... if I fellow your logic... what technology are they using? :p

in-loop filtering

Sigmatador

28th April 2003, 10:11

and the old DCT ^^

Nicolas subscribed to the Ogg Tarkin ML too.

gino25

28th April 2003, 15:31

If autor posts sources the codec may become open-source.

Why do we contact rududu by email to ask this?

Do you agree?

ChristianHJW

28th April 2003, 17:07

Originally posted by gino25 Do you agree?

Fine with me .... i could dig out the email adress if necessary ...

gino25

28th April 2003, 18:50

My english is very bad. Someone can write that email?

Sirber

28th April 2003, 21:10

I think he's french :)