PDA

View Full Version : Suddenly the file was too small


mazzo
6th April 2003, 21:13
I've used GKnot for months and it has always delivered the right filesize.

But I encoded "Signs" the other day, and the file came out with a size of 650 Mb, instead of the normal 717-719.

The quality was very good, though.

Is there an answer to this?

hakko504
6th April 2003, 22:07
Maybe.

What version of GKnot do you use, what result did the compression test give and are you using the correct version of DivX for your GKnot?

Emp3r0r
6th April 2003, 23:08
Sounds saturated, what was your first pass file size?

mazzo
7th April 2003, 09:49
I Use DivX 5.02
GKnot 0.27.0.13

The compression test showed 87.9 (!)

The credits tail was many minutes long.

I don't know how you find the first pass file size.

N_F
7th April 2003, 10:01
Originally posted by mazzo
I don't know how you find the first pass file size.
You don't with DivX.

87,9% is too high if you want to reach an exact size.

Check
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=24584 for what you can do about it.

mazzo
7th April 2003, 10:31
Well, the file was already 608 x 320 px, so if I should have increased the resolution, I would have been forced to enlarge the picture.

N_F
7th April 2003, 11:49
Originally posted by mazzo
Well, the file was already 608 x 320 px, so if I should have increased the resolution, I would have been forced to enlarge the picture.

By this I assume you mean the vertical resolution went red (100%+) in the resolution tab? Personally I have no problems going a few percentage over that, say ~104%, but I know some (respected) people think otherwise.

Anyway, your best choice if you don't want to go over 100% is to unchech B-frames. That will with most certainly lower your comp. value and you'll reach your desired filesize.

mazzo
7th April 2003, 13:40
Anyway, your best choice if you don't want to go over 100% is to unchech B-frames. That will with most certainly lower your comp. value and you'll reach your desired filesize.

Thanks, I'll try that.

Acaila
7th April 2003, 15:08
I encoded that same movie about a week ago. Even with a resolution of 640x352 I got a 1st pass size of 1 GB and a compressibility test of 75% (no B-frames). So it's definately a compressible movie. Encoding at 87% like you did is overkill and more importantly, DivX 5 has problems with reaching the target filesize when going over 80%.