PDA

View Full Version : What Audio format do you use


BiaTch 5.0
9th October 2002, 08:32
What format do you use for audio encoding & @ what bitrate, better yet with which video codec?.

Mp3

OGG

AAC

AC3

WMA

bb
9th October 2002, 09:21
Unfortunately this is not a multiple choice poll. I use AC3, MP3, and OGG. Because I use the original AC3 track from the DVD whenever possible (2-CD rips), I voted for AC3.

BTW: What about MP2 for all the SVCD guys out there?

bb

BiaTch 5.0
9th October 2002, 13:11
Originally posted by bb
Unfortunately this is not a multiple choice poll. I use AC3, MP3, and OGG. Because I use the original AC3 track from the DVD whenever possible (2-CD rips), I voted for AC3.

BTW: What about MP2 for all the SVCD guys out there?

bb

MP2 for SVCD must be used I wanted to get an idea of mpeg4 divx/xvid/WMV encoders. Too bad I can't modifiy the post.

OvERaCiD23
9th October 2002, 20:48
AC3 (5.1 when possible, 192kbps when video needs more space) most of the time (nearly all 2-cd rips). for 1-cd rips (very rare, if I'm only going to watch it once), i'll use MP3 @ 128kbps. IMHO, nothing beats watching DivX with 5.1 AC3.

lat3ralis
11th October 2002, 04:56
It's good to see that no-one is using windows media audio (i presume you meant wma 8). Although the new wma 9 pro codec is pretty good with 5.1 channel audio :)

lat3ralis

JohnMK
11th October 2002, 09:52
Ogg Vorbis qualities 0-4.

-q4 for musicals and 2 CD encodes. I never use anything higher than this, as I consider it to be audibly lossless to most ears in a non-critical listening environment. If you're going to get that picky on the audio (e.g., higher than -q4), then I guess you just need the original DVD instead of MPEG-4. :D

-q0 through -2 for 1 CD rips and episodal material, like Star Trek (-q2), Simpsons (-q1), and Sex And The City (-q0).

If I encounter a highly compressible movie, I may decide to reencode the audio to a higher bitrate. This occurs rarely, but in such a case I will use no more than --quality 4, for the reason I explained above.

JohnMK
12th October 2002, 05:55
Only 35 votes? Come come people. Let's make this representative. I suspect a lot more people use mundane ol' mp3 than are willing to admit to it. ;)

Justinus
13th October 2002, 07:14
I use MP2 for SVCD :D

DIggedy
14th October 2002, 05:08
I use mostly DTS for dvd-r where possible.

RadicalEd
14th October 2002, 20:22
You left out RealAudio, which imo still gives the best results especially at low bitrates (32 kb per channel) :sly:

But for normal XCD encodes I use vorbis at -q .200 ~90kbps most of the time along with XviD

DSPguru
14th October 2002, 20:33
Originally posted by RadicalEd
You left out RealAudiojust added.
you can place your vote now :)

user
14th October 2002, 21:37
Hi,

for HiFi audio only, I use mainly MPC now.

http://www.audio-illumination.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=11&t=1927


I think, it is not possible to implement mpc as audio to divx (and play later the divx with sound...) , or should I be wrong ?


For svcd I use mp2, but with DS2 encoded stereo.

hmm, it would be time for me to create my first divx...

Or I wait, until I have built up my audio-video-PC.



btw, for mp2 best settings in toolame or mp2enc are following:

stereo (keeping surround)

psy model:

bitrates 160 and below:
psy 2

bitrates 224 and higher:
psy 1


192 kbit/s have not been tested or published, yet.
I expect, that psy 1 or 2 will match nearly equal.

RadicalEd
14th October 2002, 23:30
Originally posted by DSPguru
just added.
you can place your vote now :)

d'oh, already voted for ogg ~__~

J_P_F
15th October 2002, 15:50
I use ogg generally Quality 0.1 (80kbph). As for video it Divx 5.02 in a ogm containter it's the most stable I've never lost audio sync. I especially like the fact that you can navigate to any part of the movie pretty straigh away with out the audio having to catch up. Ogg/vorbis rules :D

Aneurysm9
15th October 2002, 20:35
I generally use Vorbis for 1CD and most 2CD rips, but now that I've got a 240Gb RAID 0 array set up I'll probably start using AC3 more often. I recently encoded South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut with XviD 1 pass 100% quality and 5.1 AC3 transcoded to 320Kbps in just under 1.1Gb. Gotta love cheesy animation! :D

tangent
16th October 2002, 13:33
Originally posted by JohnMK
Ogg Vorbis qualities 0-4.

-q4 for musicals and 2 CD encodes. I never use anything higher than this, as I consider it to be audibly lossless to most ears in a non-critical listening environment. If you're going to get that picky on the audio (e.g., higher than -q4), then I guess you just need the original DVD instead of MPEG-4. :D

-q0 through -2 for 1 CD rips and episodal material, like Star Trek (-q2), Simpsons (-q1), and Sex And The City (-q0).

If I encounter a highly compressible movie, I may decide to reencode the audio to a higher bitrate. This occurs rarely, but in such a case I will use no more than --quality 4, for the reason I explained above.

-q-1 rocks :)

JohnMK
17th October 2002, 10:23
Yep, just tested that out. It truly does. But it honestly has no place for divx encodes! Depending on the length of the movie it can save you maybe 20-30MB for extra video quality, but the loss in audio quality is far, far more apparent than the few percent reduction in video bits. This is assuming you're doing 700MB 1 CD movie encodes. I assume it has its application elsewhere.

SILICON
22nd October 2002, 22:00
I use MP2, Is the standar for VCD & SVCD

I use 160- 224 bitrate.

For music, I use MP3. Mi standalone DVD can reat it very well.
I use LAME with ABR 192

user
22nd October 2002, 22:05
"I use LAME with ABR 192"

You use --alt-preset 192, or which setting ?

But if you go for these bitrate range, why don't you go for --alt-preset standard, or --alt-preset standard -Y , (-Y saves some bitrate) ?

MaTTeR
22nd October 2002, 23:49
AC3 about 80% of the time, the other 20% would be Vorbis at Q-3.

iago
23rd October 2002, 00:45
AC3 about 20% of the time, the other 80% would be Vorbis at Q-2. :)

aLu
23rd October 2002, 07:03
"the public" is has notified the OGG format now, and MP3 has an "outdated psychoacoustic model", so they say (PC Professional). While I mostly use OGG because of its quality at approx 64k, I still think MP3-128k is the best choice for any movie with much music (Lame Encoder, CBR -I don't think that's MP3 pro -?). For the most athmosphere, I use the original AC3, but that's rarely necessary (why not stick with the DVD then ?)

JohnMK
23rd October 2002, 07:38
People who hear well most definitely know ogg vorbis beats the crap out of mp3 @ 128kbit/s.

BluDChyLD
23rd October 2002, 19:32
i've always used mp3 at 160 (or 128 if i need more space for video), but im making my first ogg DivX as I type :)

I hope the extra audio quality will be worth the hassle, I stuck to mp3 because of it's ease of use with gordian knot... As for ac3, I keep the 2.0 tracks on a regular basis but rarely the 5.1 as I only have a 2 channel speaker setup.
BluDChyLD

P.S You guys seem to recommend very low bitrates for OGG I'm encoding at 0.350 113 at the moment, what quality is equavilent to 160 mp3?

JohnMK
24th October 2002, 04:27
You've probably right on spot.

Ogg Vorbis and mp3 produce different artifacts. I personally can't tolerate mp3s artifacts, whereas Ogg Vorbis artifacts are more subtle. For that reason, if I'm going to use mp3, I can't go below 128kbit/s. Maybe 112kbit/s is okay once in a while, but at 96kbit/s and below, mp3 starts to show its stretch marks. Ogg Vorbis is completely different. It excels at these low bitrates. Ogg Vorbis @ 80-100kbit/s is usually imperceptible from the original audio, to me, if I'm not listening extremely closely. For this reason I've now decided never to use above -quality 3, even for musicals. This to me is nearly always transparent from the original audio. If I really care about having a pristine copy of a movie, I'll just go out and buy the DVD.

BiaTch 5.0
24th October 2002, 07:31
Originally posted by JohnMK
You've probably right on spot.

Ogg Vorbis and mp3 produce different artifacts. I personally can't tolerate mp3s artifacts, whereas Ogg Vorbis artifacts are more subtle.
Just as mp3 artifacts you need trained ears to detect OGG Vorbis artifacts, after a while of OGG listening you’ll start to see they are just as bad.

JohnMK
24th October 2002, 09:12
Your point is commonly made but only partially true. Least true is that it's 'just as bad.' Many tests show otherwise.

RadicalEd
24th October 2002, 18:08
Originally posted by BiaTch 5.0

Just as mp3 artifacts you need trained ears to detect OGG Vorbis artifacts, after a while of OGG listening you’ll start to see they are just as bad.

:/
the difference is that vorbis dosent start to noticably artifact until around < 70 kbps

JohnMK
25th October 2002, 00:10
Exactly why -q1 is now my lower limit. :)

Aneurysm9
25th October 2002, 01:45
Vorbis is wonderful for commentary tracks. I usually use OggMachine's lowest quality setting and get around 45-50Kbps, but the audio is fine as it's mainly talking and the bit of background sounds that are audible are not really important. With AC3 I won't go below 96Kbps even for commentary. Hopefully the next OggDS filters will fix the problems with 5.1 and 2ch streams in the same file.

AudioVideoMaster
25th October 2002, 03:32
Definately AC3 at 448kbps about 80% of the time. Variable bit rate MP3 at 160k--320k for the other 20%. I archive old cartoons and one time only aired TV specials for later viewing for a boring or rainy day. So I use the full frame (720x480) MP2 video and AC3 audio combination the most.

:D