magubbi
29th August 2002, 11:05
Hi,
My theory is that the CRC patch is evil. It helps you effectively ignore CRC errors, but that doesn't mean they aren't there!
I have encoded a couple of movies where everything went perfectly, but when I tried to watch the movie, there would be a point where the quality of the movie would start degenerating. It would start out as a glitch, an instant of blockiness and that electronic scratching sound. It would get worse until the whole movie just froze. What I think is that CCE tried to warn me about it while I was encoding, but the CRC patch disabled the warning.
We need to find a REAL way to fix CRC errors instead of ignoring them by applying a patch. Since CRC errors rise when a pass doesn't check correctly with the previous pass, would it make sense that doing less passes would decrease problems? Any other ideas?
My theory is that the CRC patch is evil. It helps you effectively ignore CRC errors, but that doesn't mean they aren't there!
I have encoded a couple of movies where everything went perfectly, but when I tried to watch the movie, there would be a point where the quality of the movie would start degenerating. It would start out as a glitch, an instant of blockiness and that electronic scratching sound. It would get worse until the whole movie just froze. What I think is that CCE tried to warn me about it while I was encoding, but the CRC patch disabled the warning.
We need to find a REAL way to fix CRC errors instead of ignoring them by applying a patch. Since CRC errors rise when a pass doesn't check correctly with the previous pass, would it make sense that doing less passes would decrease problems? Any other ideas?