Pko
14th May 2002, 01:18
@DVD2SVCD
Is there any special reason you use Smart Deinterlace instead of decomb.dll's fielddeinterlace()? you already include the DLL and use it to IVTC, and the own Donald Graft says FieldDeinterlace() is better, since it uses the same routines of SD but only when the frame is detected as combed (so it is both faster and better quality, since the non-combed frames are not touched) That is what I have understood from reading about decomb.dll in avisynth forum, but perhaps I am missing something.
Is there any special reason you use Smart Deinterlace instead of decomb.dll's fielddeinterlace()? you already include the DLL and use it to IVTC, and the own Donald Graft says FieldDeinterlace() is better, since it uses the same routines of SD but only when the frame is detected as combed (so it is both faster and better quality, since the non-combed frames are not touched) That is what I have understood from reading about decomb.dll in avisynth forum, but perhaps I am missing something.