Bear
3rd April 2002, 20:43
Hi all,
I just got a dual AMD machine for video encoding. Want
to know the encoding speed? Here is my spec:
2 x AMD Athlon XP 1900 (yes, 2 XP but not MP. you can
check out here for details
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/articles.hwz?cid=2&aid=393)
ASUS A7M-266D
Kingston PC2100 512MB DDRAM
W.D. 80GB7200 RPM HD
Windows XP Professional
Software for encoding:
Windows Media Encoder
Windows Media Batch Encoder (from Windows Media 7
Resources Kit Beta 3)
Virtualdub (for Divx 5 encoding)
Source file:
44MB Mpeg1 (4:20, 320x240 resolution)
Encoding Time:
Wndows Media Encoder(wm8,250k,select from the default
profile) : 3:12
Windows Media Batch Encoder(wm8,250k,select from the
default profile) : 2:50
Virtualdub (to Divx 5, 780k) : 1:25
As you can see dual XP 1900 is a bit faster than real
time for mpeg1.
As you can see from my result, the encoding speed for
Virtualdub (Divx5) is much faster than Windows Media
Encoder. I know I can't compare in this way, becasue
they are differnt codes. But the differences is too
large here.
Actually, I am a little bite disappointed. Becasue I
expected the speed will close to 4X realtime(convert
to wm8). As I heard some people using dual intel can
get 2X realtime(mpeg 2 to wm8). I just don't know
what's going wrong. Is it related to my OS? Don't you
think it's a good speed(WM8)?
Any comments are welcome.
Max
I just got a dual AMD machine for video encoding. Want
to know the encoding speed? Here is my spec:
2 x AMD Athlon XP 1900 (yes, 2 XP but not MP. you can
check out here for details
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/articles.hwz?cid=2&aid=393)
ASUS A7M-266D
Kingston PC2100 512MB DDRAM
W.D. 80GB7200 RPM HD
Windows XP Professional
Software for encoding:
Windows Media Encoder
Windows Media Batch Encoder (from Windows Media 7
Resources Kit Beta 3)
Virtualdub (for Divx 5 encoding)
Source file:
44MB Mpeg1 (4:20, 320x240 resolution)
Encoding Time:
Wndows Media Encoder(wm8,250k,select from the default
profile) : 3:12
Windows Media Batch Encoder(wm8,250k,select from the
default profile) : 2:50
Virtualdub (to Divx 5, 780k) : 1:25
As you can see dual XP 1900 is a bit faster than real
time for mpeg1.
As you can see from my result, the encoding speed for
Virtualdub (Divx5) is much faster than Windows Media
Encoder. I know I can't compare in this way, becasue
they are differnt codes. But the differences is too
large here.
Actually, I am a little bite disappointed. Becasue I
expected the speed will close to 4X realtime(convert
to wm8). As I heard some people using dual intel can
get 2X realtime(mpeg 2 to wm8). I just don't know
what's going wrong. Is it related to my OS? Don't you
think it's a good speed(WM8)?
Any comments are welcome.
Max