Laryllan
13th March 2002, 18:03
Of course, DivX5 produces best picture quality - as long as there is little or low motion.
Compared to my SBC settings it fails disgracefully.
So, if anyone can report about any results regarding the "Data Rate parameters", please do so. I played with the values, encoded and encoded but none of them is able to (really) give more bits to high motion scenes. It look as if there is a hard-coded motion detection routine built into the codec that cannot be changed.
My DivX5 results so far (concerning DRC):
-RC reaction period, frames:
the only difference I can tell is that it´s degrading the smear-effect (imagine a hand wiping over a white table; the hand has a shadow of crispy-white noise). The lesser the value, the less smearing.
- Rate control down/up reaction: cannot tell any difference and tried values between 1 and 400...
So as long as the codec performs so poorly @ high motion, i´ll stick to DivX 3.11 SBC.
Ah, yes, I forgot: Naturally I´m using 2-pass in DivX5.
Compared to my SBC settings it fails disgracefully.
So, if anyone can report about any results regarding the "Data Rate parameters", please do so. I played with the values, encoded and encoded but none of them is able to (really) give more bits to high motion scenes. It look as if there is a hard-coded motion detection routine built into the codec that cannot be changed.
My DivX5 results so far (concerning DRC):
-RC reaction period, frames:
the only difference I can tell is that it´s degrading the smear-effect (imagine a hand wiping over a white table; the hand has a shadow of crispy-white noise). The lesser the value, the less smearing.
- Rate control down/up reaction: cannot tell any difference and tried values between 1 and 400...
So as long as the codec performs so poorly @ high motion, i´ll stick to DivX 3.11 SBC.
Ah, yes, I forgot: Naturally I´m using 2-pass in DivX5.