BluDChyLD
6th March 2002, 19:50
I've read that q-pel reduces macroblocking alot, but looking at some people's codec comparisons they've been leaving it off. Are there any negatives effects using it?
Thanks,
BluDChyLD
P.S I've been collecting some feedback/info on the codec options from a couple of BBSs and taking rough notes, are these correct?
Use qpel for 1 cd rips (supposeldy works best at 1/4 res), b-frames for smaller size (but slower encode) and gmc
don't bother with the inbuilt crop,resize,deinterlace etc features, just use whatever you did before
psychovisual is still buggy so leave if off for reliable rip
use post processing casually for noisy films (personal preferance)
update-gmc can cause squares in high motion scenes, use at own risk
Thanks,
BluDChyLD
P.S I've been collecting some feedback/info on the codec options from a couple of BBSs and taking rough notes, are these correct?
Use qpel for 1 cd rips (supposeldy works best at 1/4 res), b-frames for smaller size (but slower encode) and gmc
don't bother with the inbuilt crop,resize,deinterlace etc features, just use whatever you did before
psychovisual is still buggy so leave if off for reliable rip
use post processing casually for noisy films (personal preferance)
update-gmc can cause squares in high motion scenes, use at own risk