PDA

View Full Version : About multi-angle cell. Is it lagal?


jinjin_jp
24th August 2011, 00:43
I have a question about multi-angle cell.

I've ever thought that multi-angle cell is divided alternatively. It can be seen by IfoEdit.
But recently I found different cell in "UP" and "TOY STORY 3", and these have the problem when ripping which is pause of replaying angle-2. These cell changes to interleave cell when processing DvdReMakePro.

Is multi-angle cell legal which is not divided alternatively?

Here is the example.
VTS Overview
[Cell 23] [V/C Id: 21/ 1] : time: 00:00:12.09 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:27.25] [Frames: 11635] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]
[Cell 24] [V/C Id: 22/ 1] (Angle 1): time: 00:00:04.25 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:32.20] [Frames: 11780] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 25] [V/C Id: 23/ 1] (Angle 2): time: 00:00:04.25 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:32.20] [Frames: 11780] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 26] [V/C Id: 24/ 1] : time: 00:00:24.00 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:56.20] [Frames: 12500] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]
[Cell 27] [V/C Id: 25/ 1] (Angle 1): time: 00:00:03.10 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:00.00] [Frames: 12600] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 28] [V/C Id: 26/ 1] (Angle 2): time: 00:00:03.10 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:00.00] [Frames: 12600] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 29] [V/C Id: 27/ 1] : time: 00:00:14.20 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:14.20] [Frames: 13040] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]

VTS_C_ADT
[00000200] 43. Cell: VOB ID 21 [0015]
[00000202] 43. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000204] 43. Cell: Start sector 112315 [0001b6bb]
[00000208] 43. Cell: End sector 115838 [0001c47e]
[0000020c] 44. Cell: VOB ID 22 [0016]
[0000020e] 44. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000210] 44. Cell: Start sector 115839 [0001c47f]
[00000214] 44. Cell: End sector 116479 [0001c6ff]
[00000218] 45. Cell: VOB ID 22 [0016]
[0000021a] 45. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[0000021c] 45. Cell: Start sector 117120 [0001c980]
[00000220] 45. Cell: End sector 117735 [0001cbe7]
[00000224] 46. Cell: VOB ID 23 [0017]
[00000226] 46. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000228] 46. Cell: Start sector 116480 [0001c700]
[0000022c] 46. Cell: End sector 117119 [0001c97f]
[00000230] 47. Cell: VOB ID 23 [0017]
[00000232] 47. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000234] 47. Cell: Start sector 117736 [0001cbe8]
[00000238] 47. Cell: End sector 118358 [0001ce56]
[0000023c] 48. Cell: VOB ID 24 [0018]
[0000023e] 48. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000240] 48. Cell: Start sector 118359 [0001ce57]
[00000244] 48. Cell: End sector 125170 [0001e8f2]
[00000248] 49. Cell: VOB ID 25 [0019]
[0000024a] 49. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[0000024c] 49. Cell: Start sector 125171 [0001e8f3]
[00000250] 49. Cell: End sector 126066 [0001ec72]
[00000254] 50. Cell: VOB ID 26 [001a]
[00000256] 50. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000258] 50. Cell: Start sector 126067 [0001ec73]
[0000025c] 50. Cell: End sector 126961 [0001eff1]
[00000260] 51. Cell: VOB ID 27 [001b]
[00000262] 51. Cell: Cell ID 1 [01]
[00000264] 51. Cell: Start sector 126962 [0001eff2]

VTS Overview (after processing by DvdReMake Pro)
[Cell 23] [V/C Id: 21/ 1] : time: 00:00:12.09 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:30.25] [Frames: 11725] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]
[Cell 24] [V/C Id: 22/ 1] (Angle 1): time: 00:00:04.25 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:35.20] [Frames: 11870] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 25] [V/C Id: 23/ 1] (Angle 2): time: 00:00:04.25 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:35.20] [Frames: 11870] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 26] [V/C Id: 24/ 1] : time: 00:00:24.00 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:06:59.20] [Frames: 12590] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]
[Cell 27] [V/C Id: 25/ 1] (IlVu) : time: 00:00:03.10 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:03.00] [Frames: 12690] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 28] [V/C Id: 26/ 1] (IlVu) : time: 00:00:03.10 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:06.10] [Frames: 12790] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/yes/yes/ no]
[Cell 29] [V/C Id: 27/ 1] : time: 00:00:14.20 / 30 fps [Pos: 00:07:21.00] [Frames: 13230] SP/ILVU/DISC/SA:[yes/ no/yes/ no]

Cell 24 and 25 are divided alternatively in VTS_C_ADT. I've ever thought that multi-angle cell is so.
But cell 27 and 28 are not divided, and changes to interleave cell when processing DvdReMakePro.

Regards.

mpucoder
24th August 2011, 07:03
Cells 27 and 28 are short enough that they do not require more than one chunk. They are still considered interleaved (as are 24 and 25) because they represent different angles and require lower bitrate and matching duration.

jinjin_jp
24th August 2011, 12:00
Cells 27 and 28 are short enough that they do not require more than one chunk. They are still considered interleaved (as are 24 and 25) because they represent different angles and require lower bitrate and matching duration.

Thanks for the answear.
I can know they are legal.
It is strange why the problem happens in only these cell, I'll examin other reason.

Regards.