HarlockBCN
27th January 2002, 21:14
These are the facts: ( Memento moment :D)
- SVCD, 2 audio tracks, without subtitles work OK 100% on my philips-951.
- SVCD, 2 audio tracks, 1 non-permanent subtitle : it seems work OK but when passed 8-10 minutes my dvd philips-951 crashes and the movie freezes.
The only difference between the 2 streams is the second is the one altered by the SubMux program.
I know there's a lot of people who says svcd non-permanent subtitles work ok, but i think the svcd finally generated is not 100% compliant, there's a bug muxing the mpeg file with the subtitles.
In some dvd-players it may work but on anothers don't.
I found this message on a forum, it dates from November-2001:
(i don't know if there's a relation with the problem i have)
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-vcdimager/2001-November/000275.html
> From: dvd2svcd <dvd2svcd@notrace.dk>
> To: Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@hvrlab.org>
> Subject: I found a bug in Submux.
> Date: 28 Nov 2001 21:37:31 +0100
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> I know you are not the author of SubMux but I thought you might
> wanna know the bug I have found in SubMux. You have to change this > function:
>
> unsigned int getmuxr(unsigned char *buf) {
>
> return (buf[8]>>2)|(buf[7]*64)|(buf[6]*16384); //Change buf[5]
> to buf[6]. Important otherwise the muxrate in the muxed stream will
> be wrong.
>
> }
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> dvd2svcd
>
Well , thanks a lot for readme, ;)
- SVCD, 2 audio tracks, without subtitles work OK 100% on my philips-951.
- SVCD, 2 audio tracks, 1 non-permanent subtitle : it seems work OK but when passed 8-10 minutes my dvd philips-951 crashes and the movie freezes.
The only difference between the 2 streams is the second is the one altered by the SubMux program.
I know there's a lot of people who says svcd non-permanent subtitles work ok, but i think the svcd finally generated is not 100% compliant, there's a bug muxing the mpeg file with the subtitles.
In some dvd-players it may work but on anothers don't.
I found this message on a forum, it dates from November-2001:
(i don't know if there's a relation with the problem i have)
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-vcdimager/2001-November/000275.html
> From: dvd2svcd <dvd2svcd@notrace.dk>
> To: Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@hvrlab.org>
> Subject: I found a bug in Submux.
> Date: 28 Nov 2001 21:37:31 +0100
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> I know you are not the author of SubMux but I thought you might
> wanna know the bug I have found in SubMux. You have to change this > function:
>
> unsigned int getmuxr(unsigned char *buf) {
>
> return (buf[8]>>2)|(buf[7]*64)|(buf[6]*16384); //Change buf[5]
> to buf[6]. Important otherwise the muxrate in the muxed stream will
> be wrong.
>
> }
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> dvd2svcd
>
Well , thanks a lot for readme, ;)