DoctorM
26th December 2008, 21:41
I've toyed with Restore24, Mrestore, and Srestore and found results to be generally mixed (depending on the source) and very CPU intensive.
Couldn't a standard decimate filter (eg, FDecimate or TDecimate), be tweaked to allow a negative threshold or alternate mode where instead of decimating a frame that falls below the threshold value (most similar), but drops the highest metric valued frame (least similar)?
It would be wicked fast in comparison and couldn't produce results much worse than current restore filters, or plain old "bob.selecteven()".
Possible, or just a crazy random thought?
Couldn't a standard decimate filter (eg, FDecimate or TDecimate), be tweaked to allow a negative threshold or alternate mode where instead of decimating a frame that falls below the threshold value (most similar), but drops the highest metric valued frame (least similar)?
It would be wicked fast in comparison and couldn't produce results much worse than current restore filters, or plain old "bob.selecteven()".
Possible, or just a crazy random thought?