PDA

View Full Version : Extract main movie from ripped Bluray?


ben_franklin
13th April 2008, 16:08
After furiously searching for an hour or so I have given up and decided to post a thread.

What is the methodology for extracting the main movie from a Bluray ripped to the hard disk with anydvd?

Furthermore, I'd really like to just have one fat .m2ts file for archiving if that is possible.

Can somebody make a sticky for Bluray decrypting? It sure would be nice to have a bunch of this in one place.
Thanks!

MickJT
14th April 2008, 11:54
TSRemux should handle all of that, and BDEdit to get the order the files should be joined.

(Joining is a bit iffy at the moment, you might encounter some weird problems at the join points).

ben_franklin
14th April 2008, 17:03
So I take it we are all waiting for better tools?

QuadcoreHD
14th April 2008, 23:40
No, we have everything we need, but it takes several steps.

1. Decrypt with anyDVD
2. The "main file" will be huge, 15+ gigs. If its multiple files search on the slysoft forum for something like ".m2ts order for <moviename>", or ".m2ts playlist for <moviename" etc...not all movies are listed but alot are. You can figure it out easily for alot of movies with multiple feature files, but some movies (ratatoullie) has about 20 of them so its a hassle.
3. If its one file mux the needed audio and video tracks to blu-ray with TSmuxer - if its multiple files you'll need to process them individually with TSmuxer then join them with TSSplitter.
4. Create an image of that the BDMV folder created by TSmuxer with ImgBurn

all of these programs are free except anydvd, which is well worth whatever they're charging for it now

QuadcoreHD
14th April 2008, 23:45
Sorry should have added, yes there may be some stutter with joined file as MickJT said. For ratatoulli i just created an image of the entire disc, too much of a hassle.

ben_franklin
15th April 2008, 14:11
Sorry should have added, yes there may be some stutter with joined file as MickJT said. For ratatoulli i just created an image of the entire disc, too much of a hassle.

Like I was saying, we need "better tools". :)

QuadcoreHD
15th April 2008, 18:05
I mean i guess? Right now you can get 1080P rips of any HD-DVD or Blu-Ray, with DTS-HD/TRUE-HD into a format that can be readily played from any computer regardless of HDCP compliance...could it be easier to do? yes. Are there still some exceptions to the rules that cause issues? yes. but with the programs out there now, alot of which truly amazing freeware programs, id say we're all in a pretty good place. ;P

QuadcoreHD
15th April 2008, 18:07
Also, with how cheap HD space is now, just rip your movies and create .iso's with imgburn, its a 2 step process that doesnt even take that much longer than a standard DVD at this point.

SamuriHL
15th April 2008, 18:36
Why rip and convert? Why not just rip to ISO straight from the disc? Much faster.

laserfan
15th April 2008, 18:43
Why rip and convert? Why not just rip to ISO straight from the disc? Much faster.IIRC SpiderMan 3 was 49Gb total, the movie itself less than half of that...

SamuriHL
15th April 2008, 19:03
IIRC SpiderMan 3 was 49Gb total, the movie itself less than half of that...

Sure, I understand that. I was responding to the "rip it to the hard drive, then create an ISO" comment. If you're going to process it first and create a new folder structure, that's one thing. If you're just going to rip it to the hard drive, make no changes and make an ISO, that's another altogether. I don't see the point in making that a 2 step process was my point.

ben_franklin
15th April 2008, 20:56
I don't want an ISO I just want an .m2ts file with the main movie.

SamuriHL
15th April 2008, 21:17
Well, then, as has been said, you'll need to use TSRemuxer to create a new m2ts that contains only the streams you care about. And if it's a seamless branching movie, you'll have to look at the playlist and determine the play order of the m2ts files and link them together. With the possibility of having some issues at the join points. As you said, we do indeed need better tools, but, I think we're a ways away from seeing something like a Blu-rayShrink or CloneBD. :D I'm sure we will at some point, but, nothing like that exists today. This technology is still in its infancy at this point.

QuadcoreHD
15th April 2008, 21:17
@ben franklin

while its not always the case, you can run into a lot of issues with just creating an .m2ts such as audio sync, stutter with playback, audio corruption. its really just much easier to create an image because it avoids all of those problems. your .iso will be the exact same size as an .ts or .m2ts you'd create.

SamuriHL
15th April 2008, 21:24
quadcorehd, are you saying to remaster the BD folder structure once you strip it down to the streams you want and THEN master a new ISO from that? If so, I misunderstood what you were saying. In that case you may like my batch file I created for converting folders->ISOs using ImgBurn. Much easier than doing it by hand. you simply pass it the folder name and it creates a corresponding .iso for it. :)


@echo off
set SRC=C:\Movies
set DEST=C:\ISOs
set PathToImgBurn=C:\Program Files\ImgBurn

"%PathToImgBurn%\ImgBurn.exe" /MODE BUILD /BUILDMODE IMAGEFILE /SRC "%SRC%\%1" /DEST "%DEST%\%1.ISO" /FILESYSTEM "UDF" /UDFREVISION "2.50" /VOLUMELABEL "%1" /CLOSE /NOIMAGEDETAILS /ROOTFOLDER "YES" /START


Edit the SRC and DEST variables to match your system.

QuadcoreHD
15th April 2008, 21:29
You nailed it Samuri, that's what i was getting it, sorry, i think my posts really lack when im at work...

Wow man thanks for that, that is awesome! I've actually been trying to figure out a way to do EXACTLY the same thing! thanks! I'll check it out later tonight.

SamuriHL
15th April 2008, 21:59
Some of the guys on the Slysoft forum helped me immensely by debugging it for me. That's the final script we came up with. We just throw it in a file called makeISO.bat, stick it in the path, and call it with the name of the folder that contains the movie...i.e.:

makeISO DIEHARD
makeISO SIMPSON_MOVIE

etc.

Also, you can call it in batch:

CallMakeISO.bat

@echo off
call makeISO DIEDHARD
call makeISO SIMPSONS_MOVIE


You get the idea. That way you can batch everything if you have a bunch of movies on your hard drive you want to convert to ISO.

QuadcoreHD
15th April 2008, 22:09
Awesome! This will seriously save me so much time! : )

MickJT
16th April 2008, 03:34
if its multiple files you'll need to process them individually with TSmuxer then join them with TSSplitter.

Can't TSMuxer join too?

Just wanted to make a note here. Joined .m2ts files (ex. from "Meet The Robinsons") play fine under Windows Media Player via DirectShow and Haali Media Splitter with PowerDVD Codecs, but once you try to actually play it in PowerDVD itself, or on the PS3 as a burnt disc, it has problems unless you re-encode the entire movie (or apparently use tsremux or tsmuxer on the joined file and re-save it).

I haven't tried TSMuxer to join files, but i'm pretty sure it's capable of it. I don't know if it can do it seamlessly though. We really need a proper m2ts joiner.

SamuriHL
16th April 2008, 03:36
The new version (1.76) says it can open mpls files. I wonder if that means it can follow the chains? This is something I'll want to be testing out for sure!

ben_franklin
21st April 2008, 18:51
Can somebody make a sticky for Bluray decrypting? It sure would be nice to have a bunch of this in one place.
Thanks!

Anyone?

QuadcoreHD
21st April 2008, 19:47
I'm planning on doing it, just haven't gotten around to it yet. plus theres a bunch of ways that it can be done at this point.

jamd1
23rd April 2008, 09:12
A sticky would be great for Blu-ray ripping and decrypting with shrinking options.

QuadcoreHD
23rd April 2008, 22:22
@jamd1

done. no shrinking options tho :P

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=137151

laserfan
23rd April 2008, 23:59
I'd really like to just have one fat .m2ts file for archiving...
I don't want an ISO I just want an .m2ts file with the main movie.
...you can run into a lot of issues with just creating an .m2ts such as audio sync, stutter with playback, audio corruption. its really just much easier to create an image because it avoids all of those problems. I'm confused; can someone explain how creation of an .iso image avoids "all of those problems" vs. making just a big m2ts? An image is an image of...the re-do including any inherent problems the re-do may have? :confused:

QuadcoreHD
24th April 2008, 01:23
I honestly cannot tell you why, but there are sync and playback issues with creating an .m2ts file for certain movies. I have asked specifically why this occurs and what causes it, on this forum, and nobody has responded. Please don't interprate that as a knock at all on doom9, its an AMAZING site, but I'm not sure if anyone really knows the specifics of why playback issues can occur in .m2ts or .ts files. All I can say is that creating an .iso of that exact same .m2ts (after its been muxed to blu-ray structure with tsmuxer) solves any sync issues.

laserfan
24th April 2008, 14:34
All I can say is that creating an .iso of that exact same .m2ts (after its been muxed to blu-ray structure with tsmuxer) solves any sync issues.Good enough, thanks!

ben_franklin
20th June 2008, 20:38
Still waiting for a solution.... :)

RunningSkittle
21st June 2008, 03:58
I wrote this little batch script to walk through all of the directories in c:\Movies (or any parent directory) automatically. I think it works. The code is defaulted to only echo the output, so you can test it :)

@echo off
color 0a
title Makeiso

::Variable 'src' needs to have a period at the end of the directory name, otherwise "for /r" will enumerate the parent directory.
set src=c:\movies\.
set DEST=C:\ISOs
set PathToImgBurn=C:\Program Files\ImgBurn

for /r %src% %%a in (.) do (call :list "%%a")
goto end
:list
for /f "tokens=1 delims=." %%c in (%1) do set fullpath=%%c
for /f "tokens=3 delims=\." %%b in (%1) do set shortpath=%%b
if %1 NEQ "%src%" echo ("%PathToImgBurn%\ImgBurn.exe" /MODE BUILD /BUILDMODE IMAGEFILE /SRC "%fullpath%" /DEST "%DEST%\%shortpath%.ISO" /FILESYSTEM "UDF" /UDFREVISION "2.50" /VOLUMELABEL "%fullpath%" /CLOSE /NOIMAGEDETAILS /ROOTFOLDER "YES" /START)
::The line above only echos the output, to test.
::if %1 NEQ "%src%" ("%PathToImgBurn%\ImgBurn.exe" /MODE BUILD /BUILDMODE IMAGEFILE /SRC "%fullpath%" /DEST "%DEST%\%shortpath%.ISO" /FILESYSTEM "UDF" /UDFREVISION "2.50" /VOLUMELABEL "%fullpath%" /CLOSE /NOIMAGEDETAILS /ROOTFOLDER "YES" /START)
goto eof
:end
pause

:eof

ben_franklin
21st June 2008, 23:15
So, are you saying that by running your bat file with imageburn, I will get an "image" with one fat .m2ts file of the main movie?

Because it doesnt look like your bat file does anything special other than passing imageburn parameters....

SamuriHL
22nd June 2008, 00:24
That script takes ripped movies on the hard drive and turns the folders into ISOs. It's a more advanced version of what I've posted before. (Nice additions, btw. :)) It requires that the folder you have on the hard drive be a blu-ray folder structure in order for it to work. One fat m2ts file is not going to do it. I suggest you learn to make movie only folder structures using this method:

http://forum.slysoft.com/showthread.php?t=16922

TSmuxer and eac3to are absolutely WONDERFUL tools and we owe the authors of both a debt of gratitude for their hard work. Also, if you want to shrink it down, RipBot is an excellent tool, as well. Also, the author of RipBot said the next version will be able to automagically open seamless branching titles so the eac3to step won't be necessary. Most impressive.

RunningSkittle
22nd June 2008, 01:59
Yup, my script just tries to automate this part, without any user input.


CallMakeISO.bat

@echo off
call makeISO DIEDHARD
call makeISO SIMPSONS_MOVIE

SamuriHL
22nd June 2008, 06:17
Yup, my script just tries to automate this part, without any user input.

Yea, like I said, very nice additions. I rather like it.

ben_franklin
23rd June 2008, 23:16
Please don't get me wrong, I understand you guys are trying to help but I am really looking for someone to go ahead and implement this as an automatic function in either their ripper or demuxer. Thanks!!

P.s. I don't really do any of the work with ISO's like you guys do, I am just focused on converting to playable video files.

SamuriHL
23rd June 2008, 23:19
Well, in that case, I wish you the best of luck then.

dat720
24th June 2008, 11:09
Please don't get me wrong, I understand you guys are trying to help but I am really looking for someone to go ahead and implement this as an automatic function in either their ripper or demuxer. Thanks!!

It took a very long time between DVD-Rom drives for PC's and a DVD to AVI all in one program to become available, like years!!!! the one's around still don't suit my need's i'd rather do it manually, you're even lucky there is the amount of BR/HD support that there currently is!!!

If you want a automatic all in one maybe it's time to get coding!!!

SamuriHL
24th June 2008, 14:39
It took a very long time between DVD-Rom drives for PC's and a DVD to AVI all in one program to become available, like years!!!! the one's around still don't suit my need's i'd rather do it manually, you're even lucky there is the amount of BR/HD support that there currently is!!!

If you want a automatic all in one maybe it's time to get coding!!!

I'm actually amazed we're as far along as we are. People don't seem to get the complexity of HD DVD/BD. It's not like DVD where you've got a menu, an mpeg video stream, and MAYBE DTS and AC3 to deal with. On HD DVD/BD you've got 3 different video codecs to deal with, a myriad of possible audio formats, a completely new subtitle format, and a menuing structure that's insane to deal with. Possibly having java thrown in for fun! The fact that the brilliant authors of the tools we have now have gotten so far so quickly with things like identifying seamless branching playlists and being able to demux and remaster the streams into compliant structures....truly amazing. This isn't kid's stuff. This is some hardcore work that's involved here.

QuadcoreHD
24th June 2008, 20:17
@dat720 and SamuriHL

You guys nailed it right on the head as usual. Ben_franklin - if you want a one click solution (even though i think you've been provided with like a 2 or 3 click one) you should get that started. I think there are many people out there such as yourself who are looking for a quick and effort free program to rip Blu-Ray/HD-DVD's...unfortunately we're probably a while away from that and will have to settle for a 2 click solution using many of the amazing FREE programs lots of people have worked hard on creating - as well as just a bit of time and effort on our part.

Finally, I can't say this any more clearly - there are issues with creating .m2ts files and watching them directly. The ONLY reason anyone is suggesting using ImgBurn is because creating an ISO eliminates playback issues for now. It's as simple as that, and creating an iso of even a 40gb file takes maybe 45 minutes on a run of the mill cpu.

ben_franklin
25th June 2008, 20:03
@dat720 and SamuriHL

You guys nailed it right on the head as usual. Ben_franklin - if you want a one click solution (even though i think you've been provided with like a 2 or 3 click one) you should get that started. I think there are many people out there such as yourself who are looking for a quick and effort free program to rip Blu-Ray/HD-DVD's...unfortunately we're probably a while away from that and will have to settle for a 2 click solution using many of the amazing FREE programs lots of people have worked hard on creating - as well as just a bit of time and effort on our part.

Finally, I can't say this any more clearly - there are issues with creating .m2ts files and watching them directly. The ONLY reason anyone is suggesting using ImgBurn is because creating an ISO eliminates playback issues for now. It's as simple as that, and creating an iso of even a 40gb file takes maybe 45 minutes on a run of the mill cpu.

Its not even an issue of "free". I have purchased DVDFAB and AnyDVDHD, its just a matter of having one of them implement "main movie" selection.

I really don't have any ISO related needs. I only want to convert the movie to a 360/PS3/media extender playable media file for convenience sake. "Hollywood" doesn't understand that. Its not about "thievin" its about CONVENIENCE!!!

Right now I have to decide what to transcode to, depending on whether I want to play it on 360 or PS3.

What I would ultimately like to have are just H.264 or VC.1 movie files with DTSHD, trueHD, or PCM that were created by muxing the .m2ts data to the right container. Then I would just need a media player box (not PC) that is capable of playing these files.

SamuriHL
26th June 2008, 00:54
Eventually we can expect to see an updated CloneDVD Mobile that'll handle this conversion. And a CloneBD most likely to handle ripping apart blu-ray structures like we do now with DVD's. But, neither are likely to be out any time soon. Muxing a video, audio, and subtitle stream to an m2ts is academic at this point. It's as close to one click as you're going to get right now. Maybe in a month or two they'll have updated TSMuxer to automagically handle seamless branching, but, until then you simply need to identify the playlist file of the main movie and open that file in TSMuxer. I don't understand the problem exactly.

ben_franklin
26th June 2008, 03:40
I don't understand the problem exactly.
Which problem? There are two.

Regarding the "finding the right set of files to make the movie a.k.a seamless branching", for example "deja vu". Lets suppose I have the list of files. I have to convert these all to a single WMV so I can watch it on a media player box. I can use a variety of tools to convert the seperate .m2ts files to wmv files and then use asfbin to "stitch" them together. However this is not a hi fidelity solution. There are often audio pops and picture glitches from doing so.
Thats a problem.

Regarding the "container" option I want to pursue.
What if I want the utmost quality and dont want to transcode the VC1 or H.264 file other than changing their "container", how would I do that? Additionally, how would I do that and sew them all back together?
Thats a problem.

You with me? :)

SamuriHL
26th June 2008, 03:46
Regarding the "finding the right set of files to make the movie a.k.a seamless branching", for example "deja vu". Lets suppose I have the list of files. I have to convert these all to a single WMV so I can watch it on a media player box. I can use a variety of tools to convert the seperate .m2ts files to wmv files and then use asfbin to "stitch" them together. However this is not a hi fidelity solution. There are often audio pops and picture glitches from doing so.
Thats a problem.


Um, WHAT?! You didn't get a thing I said did you? :) If you use eac3to on the disc, it will display a list of playlist files. Pick the one that corresponds to the main movie. (Usually the longest one) Then *OPEN THAT PLAYLIST FILE IN TSMUXER*. NOT the individual m2ts files. That's ridiculous. Of course you think this is difficult if that's what you believe you need to do!! In TSMuxer, deselect the streams you don't want, and then output it to a SINGLE, JOINED m2ts file. Then convert that to whatever you want or stream it to wherever if your device supports it.



Regarding the "container" option I want to pursue.
What if I want the utmost quality and dont want to transcode the VC1 or H.264 file other than changing their "container", how would I do that? Additionally, how would I do that and sew them all back together?
Thats a problem.

You with me? :)

See answer above. You can throw it out to a ts file or blu-ray folder structure, as well. Or you can use eac3to on the original disc and jam it all into an MKV container in ONE EASY STEP. No joining, no nonsense. This is WAY easier than you're making it out to be.

ben_franklin
26th June 2008, 04:27
Ok, by all means tell me how to "If you use eac3to on the disc, it will display a list of playlist files"

I am all ears.

SamuriHL
26th June 2008, 04:37
Are you kidding? eac3to d: where d: is your drive letter?

ben_franklin
26th June 2008, 04:59
Are you kidding? eac3to d: where d: is your drive letter?

Thanks, I had no idea it did that. I'm going to bust one out, I'll let you know what happens.

SamuriHL
26th June 2008, 05:01
No problem. Also, if you specify what streams you want, it'll throw it into an mkv for you, as well. So you can do that directly from the disc and it'll do all the joining and all that crap for you...you just give it one command and you get a nice MKV with no transcoding necessary. SWEET. :)

dat720
26th June 2008, 11:23
What I would ultimately like to have are just H.264 or VC.1 movie files with DTSHD, trueHD, or PCM that were created by muxing the .m2ts data to the right container. Then I would just need a media player box (not PC) that is capable of playing these files.

If you convert your BluRay's to AVI with XVID/DIVX and MP3/AC3 audio, your ps3 and 360 will be able to play them back without transcoding.

EPiPH0NE
26th June 2008, 17:29
What I would ultimately like to have are just H.264 or VC.1 movie files with DTSHD, trueHD, or PCM that were created by muxing the .m2ts data to the right container. Then I would just need a media player box (not PC) that is capable of playing these files.


Get an NMT and you can use ES 1080p video streams + (L)PCM audio in TS/M2TS. Plays great. :) All you need is eac3to, Pcm2Tsmu, and tsMuxeR.

ben_franklin
26th June 2008, 19:44
Get an NMT and you can use ES 1080p video streams + (L)PCM audio in TS/M2TS. Plays great. :) All you need is eac3to, Pcm2Tsmu, and tsMuxeR.

What is an NMT? I went to wiki and looked, nothing there was a media player.... :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMT

EPiPH0NE
27th June 2008, 09:17
What is an NMT? I went to wiki and looked, nothing there was a media player.... :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMT

LOL...Networked Media Tank :)

ben_franklin
27th June 2008, 17:06
LOL...Networked Media Tank :)

Thats the first I've heard of this:
http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/27/popcorn-hours-networked-media-tank-gets-reviewed/

laserfan
28th June 2008, 16:53
Get an NMT and you can use ES 1080p video streams + (L)PCM audio in TS/M2TS. Plays great. :) All you need is eac3to, Pcm2Tsmu, and tsMuxeR.Why the (L)PCM audio--doesn't at least the Popcorn Hour NMT play all the usual formats?

SamuriHL
28th June 2008, 17:42
Define "usual" formats. :) I didn't think it did any HD audio formats. LPCM would be good if it does that.

EPiPH0NE
28th June 2008, 22:32
Why the (L)PCM audio--doesn't at least the Popcorn Hour NMT play all the usual formats?

As far as HD audio the current NMT's, with the exception of the 6500A (I think it can bit stream DTS-MA/TrueHD) , only do (L)PCM which is fine for me cause that's all my AVR can handle. I just do DTS-MA/TrueHD -> PCM in software then remux to TS/M2TS.

laserfan
29th June 2008, 00:05
Thanks. I was confused because your post mentioned eac3to, which of course can convert HD formats to standard AC3 or DTS which I was sure the NMT would handle...

ben_franklin
29th June 2008, 08:36
OK, so back to the original discussion....

-Use eac3to to get the playlist.

-Open the playlist in tsmuxer and demux.

And then TMPEGenc cannot read the resulting VC1 or 264 file.... :(

Hey, at least its one big file now, and the audio isnt a problem, though tsmuxer chops PCM into 4 gig files....

p.s. This is the new bluray compatible TMPEGenc that just came out 2 days ago.....

dat720
29th June 2008, 09:24
What are you trying to get tmpgenc to do with the file?

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 15:00
I don't have any experience with the new TMPGEnc. I'll be no help on that one I'm afraid.

ben_franklin
29th June 2008, 17:07
What are you trying to get tmpgenc to do with the file?

Until such time as I have a "box" that will play the native VC1 and 264 files, I have been converting them to WMV.

Any idea what container Tsmuxer is putting the VC1 and 264 files into? Because tmpgenc will read VC1 and 264 files, just not the ones that come out of Tsmuxer....

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 17:32
It depends on what container you tell it to put them in. m2ts, ts, or blu-ray folder structure. In your case, I'd extract the raw video and audio streams (can be done with eac3to or tsmuxer) and use those in tmpgenc.

ben_franklin
29th June 2008, 18:06
It depends on what container you tell it to put them in. m2ts, ts, or blu-ray folder structure. In your case, I'd extract the raw video and audio streams (can be done with eac3to or tsmuxer) and use those in tmpgenc.

When I "demux" in tsmuxer, the resulting 264 or VC1 files cannot be read by tmpenc.

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 18:07
That says quite a bit about tmpgenc's ability to read raw streams, doesn't it? :) They're not in a container when you demux. They're raw.

odditory
29th June 2008, 18:46
No offense to the OP, but I'm amazed at the patience of some of you guys trying to help somebody that's kind of stubborn about following advice.

On the other hand this info is perfect and what I was looking for since I've finally taken the BD plunge and am tired of other peoples' crappy quality MKV encodes of 1080p sources (on a 65" screen I once again see macroblocking even at 1080p, whereas on 50" I never really noticed), and am ready to see full-bitrate stuff I rip myself.

My opinion is that anyone really SERIOUS about BD playback shouldn't be bothering with trying to beat a square peg into a round hole and trying to play back through a PS3 or XBOX360. I think an HTPC with carefully selected components is the best way to go right now, given the "perfect storm" of components that make the system work: 1) PowerDVD + Nvidia or ATI card capable of 'accelerating' decoding on GPU, 2) Cheap ($150) BD-ROM drive (LG), 3) AnyDVDHD, 4) Media Center inside Vista (used to hate Vista, but since SP1 its great) plus MyMovies plug. It's also not one-click "family friendly" the way Vista Media Center can be with a Harmony remote.

It just doesn't get any better than that. I've spent a LONG time evaluating XBOX360 as an 'extender' and the bottom line is the XBOX360 will always be a game machine first and extender second. TOO many drawbacks, codec incompatibilities, etc.

Nothing currently (outside of Kaleidescape which will cost over $100,000 for a basic system) can touch the flowing interface of Vista Media Center + MyMovies powered by PowerDVD's GPU-accelerated decoders + AnyDVDHD stripping all the B.S.

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 18:53
I keep hearing good things about mymovies. I still haven't messed with it myself. I have to agree that a good HTPC beats all. However, there's one thing missing IMO. HDMI audio that's unmolested. It's coming. I just upgraded to an Onkyo 606 receiver last night and my PS3 is now connected to it via HDMI. The sound is unmatched. I have hope that the 4xxx ati cards will have PowerDVD support for unmolested audio with PowerDVD 8's next upgrade. If so, I MAY retire my 8800 GT and drop one of those in my machine. Then my HTPC experience will be complete. :)

odditory
29th June 2008, 19:00
I keep hearing good things about mymovies. I still haven't messed with it myself. I have to agree that a good HTPC beats all. However, there's one thing missing IMO. HDMI audio that's unmolested. It's coming. I just upgraded to an Onkyo 606 receiver last night and my PS3 is now connected to it via HDMI. The sound is unmatched. I have hope that the 4xxx ati cards will have PowerDVD support for unmolested audio with PowerDVD 8's next upgrade. If so, I MAY retire my 8800 GT and drop one of those in my machine. Then my HTPC experience will be complete. :)

Are you saying that, let's say, 5.1 channel DTS over HDMI will sound better than 5.1 channel DTS over TOSLINK?

I probably need to do some more homework on the audio side of things, since my time's been consumed perfecting the video side of my 'ultimate setup' (including going through 4 HDTV's before finally landing on the one that I found acceptable - a 65" Panny!)

I too am in the market for a better receiver - I'll look at the Onkyo you mentioned. Just need some decent floor-standing speakers afterward.

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 19:12
Are you saying that, let's say, 5.1 channel DTS over HDMI will sound better than 5.1 channel DTS over TOSLINK?

I probably need to do some more homework on the audio side of things, since so much time's been spent perfecting the video (including going through 4 HDTV's before finally landing on the one that I found acceptable - a 65" Panny)

I too am in the market for a better receiver - I'll look at the Onkyo you mentioned. Just need some decent floor-standing speakers afterward.

What the?! :D No, that's not what I'm saying. If you're dealing with blu-ray, my friend, you are dealing with HD audio which BURIES DTS over HDMI OR S/PDIF. ;) Consider this...DTS tops out at 1.5mbps. That's the MOST bandwidth you're gonna get out of an S/PDIF connection.

Now, let's consider REAL audio. :D LPCM is uncompressed and the highest quality you can get. I have many Disney made Blu-ray discs that are 6.9mbps for audio. That's what DVD's had for video! ;) HDMI allows you to send an uncompressed LPCM track down the pipe to your HD audio receiver (i.e. the 606 in my case). Next up we have TrueHD and DTS HD MA. Those are the same thing as uncompressed LPCM. How? Think of them like this...RAR and ZIP. When you rar a file, you're compressing it. But the contents of that file are still the same. When you zip a file, the same thing. TrueHD and DTS HD MA are simply compression formats. The player or receiver uncompresses them on the fly (decoding) to get...an uncompressed LPCM track.

The only way to get the LPCM track to your receiver is through HDMI (digitally) or through analog 8 channel output. HDMI is the way to go. I've done both. The bigger debate raging these days isn't HDMI vs whatever, it's to bitstream or not. Bitstreaming will send the TrueHD or DTS HD MA track untouched down the HDMI pipe to the receiver. The receiver decodes it and plays it back. The other way is to let the player decode the TrueHD or DTS HD MA track and send the LPCM track down the pipe to the receiver. This is my preferred method. Reason being is the player can mix other sounds into the track before it sends it to the receiver. This is required in order to do profile 1.1 and BD Live features. Note that the sound is going to be identical. All decoding does is decompress the audio.

In any case, HD audio is where it's at. Forget S/PDIF and DTS. I hope this little primer helps.

laserfan
29th June 2008, 21:39
In any case, HD audio is where it's at. Forget S/PDIF and DTS. I hope this little primer helps.Unless of course your ears are ~60 years old and/or require in-ear amplification. In which case HD audio ain't worth a red cent. :p

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 21:42
Unless of course your ears are ~60 years old and/or require in-ear amplification. In which case HD audio ain't worth a red cent. :p

Well, you know, you do have to have ears that can discern the difference, yes. :D I grew up playing an instrument so sound is critical to me.

odditory
29th June 2008, 23:27
What the?! :D No, that's not what I'm saying. If you're dealing with blu-ray, my friend, you are dealing with HD audio which BURIES DTS over HDMI OR S/PDIF. ;) Consider this...DTS tops out at 1.5mbps. That's the MOST bandwidth you're gonna get out of an S/PDIF connection.

Now, let's consider REAL audio. :D LPCM is uncompressed and the highest quality you can get. I have many Disney made Blu-ray discs that are 6.9mbps for audio. That's what DVD's had for video! ;) HDMI allows you to send an uncompressed LPCM track down the pipe to your HD audio receiver (i.e. the 606 in my case). Next up we have TrueHD and DTS HD MA. Those are the same thing as uncompressed LPCM. How? Think of them like this...RAR and ZIP. When you rar a file, you're compressing it. But the contents of that file are still the same. When you zip a file, the same thing. TrueHD and DTS HD MA are simply compression formats. The player or receiver uncompresses them on the fly (decoding) to get...an uncompressed LPCM track.

The only way to get the LPCM track to your receiver is through HDMI (digitally) or through analog 8 channel output. HDMI is the way to go. I've done both. The bigger debate raging these days isn't HDMI vs whatever, it's to bitstream or not. Bitstreaming will send the TrueHD or DTS HD MA track untouched down the HDMI pipe to the receiver. The receiver decodes it and plays it back. The other way is to let the player decode the TrueHD or DTS HD MA track and send the LPCM track down the pipe to the receiver. This is my preferred method. Reason being is the player can mix other sounds into the track before it sends it to the receiver. This is required in order to do profile 1.1 and BD Live features. Note that the sound is going to be identical. All decoding does is decompress the audio.

In any case, HD audio is where it's at. Forget S/PDIF and DTS. I hope this little primer helps.

Good infoz... much appreciated, my man. I've been staring at Onkyo's SR875 receiver a little while now today :) thankfully I didn't buy an HDMI / TOSLINK switchbox for $300 so I can put the money toward an A/V receiver (switchbox) instead, among all the other benefits.

SamuriHL
29th June 2008, 23:30
That's an amazing rig. The 606 I just got is absolutely fantastic for the price I paid for it. At some point I'll get a set of 7.1 speakers that'll do it justice, but, for now my Yamaha mid range speakers are keeping up. I couldn't be happier with the sound coming out of this thing. My HTPC is connected via analog and my PS3 is connected via HDMI. PS3 buries the analog coming out of the HTPC without a doubt. Still WAYYYYY better than S/PDIF even with the analog, but, nothing matches the HDMI LPCM. It's an experience you should really strive to have. :)

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 01:15
I have a boatload to say about audio streams and their physical transports, but can we save that for another thread????

So, my wishlist is now:

1. want TSmuxer to pick out the main movie playlist and tag the main movie so I don't have to use eac3to OR want AnyDVD/DVDfab to rip the main movie only.....

2. want TSmuxer to stop breaking the PCM into 4 GB chunks....

3. want TSmuxer to give the option of putting the raw streams in containers so more programs can read them....

Hey, if I open the playlist for the main movie and tell TSmuxer to create a BD structure with it, will it make one big .m2ts file???

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 01:41
What the.... ?? TSMuxer already has the option of putting things into an m2ts or ts container. No need to create a blu-ray folder structure if all you want is a single m2ts file.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 02:11
What the.... ?? TSMuxer already has the option of putting things into an m2ts or ts container. No need to create a blu-ray folder structure if all you want is a single m2ts file.

SamuriHL, I appreciate the help, but if you go look at the thread starting at page1, you never actually told me that it could do a single m2ts file, or how to do one. You guys kept talking about making an image with it and using an image program to read and play it..... :)

All I ever wanted was one big m2ts file with the movie, but now I have evolved to where I want TSmuxer to put the demuxed streams into "recognizable" containers as well.... :)

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 02:19
I just assumed that anyone opening TSMuxer would see the "output m2ts" and "output ts" and figure out that they might output m2ts and ts files. I'm seriously not going to tell you every single button to push. There comes a point where you've got to do a little reading on your own and figure things out. I use TSMuxer to output a BD structure that I can then make an ISO from. That's what *I* do. The title of this thread, if you read it again, is "Extract main movie from ripped Bluray?" There are numerous ways to do that. That's just the method I use.

I also think you're severely confused. TSMuxer DOES output streams to a "recognizable container". As I said already. m2ts and ts. If TMPGEnc doesn't recognize those, it's hardly the fault of TSMuxer. Can TMPGEnc open an MKV container? If so, use eac3to to create an MKV containing the streams you want. Otherwise you will need to find out what container formats TMPGEnc supports and figure out how to put the raw streams into that container. Truly sounds like a major pain to me. My method is much simpler. :)

In any case, you need to learn to do the things you're asking for. You can't just expect that people are going to tell you what's on the screen when they point you in the right direction. (I.E. TSMuxer being able to output m2ts and ts containers...)

EPiPH0NE
30th June 2008, 02:35
All I ever wanted was one big m2ts file with the movie, but now I have evolved to where I want TSmuxer to put the demuxed streams into "recognizable" containers as well.... :)


First off, I wouldn't rely on tsMuxeR's demuxing, but for what your trying to do, which most of the people that have replied, including myself, have been doing for quite a while now and have already explained it but here it goes again:

1) Rip BluRay to HDD, or axxs straight from disc

2) IF the BluRay isn't seamlessly branched you can just go ahead and pick your streams and remux to TS/M2TS -> Done.

2a) IF seamless branching is present you will need to use either eac3to or BDedit to determine what playlist (MPLS file) you will need and then load that MPLS into tsMuxeR, pick your streams and mux to TS/M2TS -> done.

2b) If after muxing your branch points go out of synch then you will need to run the title set (MPLS) through eac3to which will take care of the audio gaps. In this case you can either choose to demux the stream using eac3to or mux to MKV (what I do) and then take that resulting file, input it into tsMuxeR, choose your streams and mux to TS/M2TS.



That's pretty much it in a nut shell. There isn't much to it.

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 02:39
EPiPHONE,

Can MKV handle HD audio streams ok? I've never tried but am curious if I can use eac3to to build an MKV that contains an HD video and say, a TrueHD or DTS HD MA audio track. How about subs? (Yea, I know, I can go look but if you know off hand that'd be helpful.)

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 02:41
I'm seriously not going to tell you every single button to push. There comes a point where you've got to do a little reading on your own and figure things out.


Please don't assume somebody hasn't spent hundreds of hours reading 100+ page threads trying to figure this out already. I'm not implying your daft for not understanding what I want and I believe you shouldn't imply that I haven't spent what could only be called "ridiculously" huge amounts of time working with this....

None of it is even remotely straightforward or documented in any cohesive source in any way shape or form. Never assume that this is easy to learn for layman or scholar alike, it isn't.

As long as the tools aren't there to easily go from point a to b, people are going to be forced to grok nuances of the video streaming world that they really shouldn't have to (does anybody really give a **** about the inside of the microwave they use every day?)

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 02:45
I understand that, but, when we say open the MPLS with TSMuxer, we have to assume you can see what output options exist, no? We've tried to simplify it as much as possible in this thread for you. Not knowing TMPGEnc and what it can and can't handle for HD input makes it a bit more difficult. But, if it supports BD structures like the home page claims, one would have to assume it can handle an m2ts file which TSMuxer can quite easily make using the steps we've all documented several times in this thread. If it doesn't handle an m2ts file, then its worth as an HD encoder has to be questioned IMO. :)

EPiPH0NE
30th June 2008, 02:48
EPiPHONE,

Can MKV handle HD audio streams ok? I've never tried but am curious if I can use eac3to to build an MKV that contains an HD video and say, a TrueHD or DTS HD MA audio track. How about subs? (Yea, I know, I can go look but if you know off hand that'd be helpful.)


Eac3to can only mux video into MKV not audio.

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 02:49
Eac3to can only mux video into MKV not audio.

Ah, didn't know that. Still could be useful in some ways, though. Depending on what your ultimate goal is.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 02:57
My wish would be that the "videosphere" (the active community of vid enthusiasts and the related businesses) would all get on the same page as far as a @#%@^% standardized "container" for streams and just use that one!!!
Additionally, I know this is all in the early "no mans land" of discovery, but it sure in the hell would be nice if those making the tools would make more assumptions like A. people are going to want the main movie and not want to figure it out before or after the fact. B. people are going to want to take the resulting data and open it up with mainstream video tools and not have to "go Hax0r" to figure it all out....

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:19
You need to realize that these tools are EXTREMELY hard to write. There are 3 different video formats, a ton of audio, seamless branching issues, complex menu structures, subtitles that are different, etc, etc. The authors know what people want. Read the TSMuxer thread. How many PAGES is it? A lot of it is requests. The tools will continue to evolve. The next version of TSMuxer will probably be able to select the main movie quite easily. RipBot will be able to for sure according to the author. The authors are not paid for their work. They do it on their free time. You need to have respect for what they've done for us and continue to do.

dat720
30th June 2008, 03:29
My wish would be that the "videosphere" (the active community of vid enthusiasts and the related businesses) would all get on the same page as far as a @#%@^% standardized "container" for streams and just use that one!!!

That is never going to happen!!! as long as there are competing companies out there trying to get your money then there will be different standards!!! simple as that.

A. people are going to want the main movie and not want to figure it out before or after the fact.

Have you tried demuxing a Bluray with eac3to (which can get just the main movie!!!) then open the resulting mkv with tmpegenc???

Do not forget that some discs contain 2, yes 2 main movie streams.. I am Legend is a perfect example it contains the theatrical cut, and a alternate ending cut.. how does a program decide which stream you want?

B. people are going to want to take the resulting data and open it up with mainstream video tools and not have to "go Hax0r" to figure it all out....

As you said before this is early day's BE THANKFUL that there are products around that can demux and convert HD/DVD.....

Bitching and whining about the current state of software is not going to get things done any quicker, the software devs will add features as they 1 figure out how to and 2 have the time to, DO NOT forget that all these people currently working on product's like eac3to and tsremux are doing so unpaid in their own free time, maybe if you want things done quicker you should donate to the author's.....

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 03:29
You need to have respect for what they've done for us and continue to do.
And I have given that respect by paying for the tools I use. :)

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 03:32
I dont believe previous versions of tmpegenc would handle MKV, but a new one just came out two days ago, so I might give it a shot....

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:33
And I have given that respect by paying for the tools I use. :)

Excellent. Now be patient while they add the most requested features when they can get to it. Donations are great and I'm sure the authors sincerely appreciate that, but, donations don't pay the mortgage. :) They still have to find time and energy to add the features.

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:33
I dont believe previous versions of tmpegenc would handle MKV, but a new one just came out two days ago, so I might give it a shot....

I'm not very impressed with what you've told us so far about the new version of TMPGEnc. :)

dat720
30th June 2008, 03:33
EPiPHONE,

Can MKV handle HD audio streams ok? I've never tried but am curious if I can use eac3to to build an MKV that contains an HD video and say, a TrueHD or DTS HD MA audio track. How about subs? (Yea, I know, I can go look but if you know off hand that'd be helpful.)

As EPiPHONE already replied, all i will say is that i demux video to mkv and audio to ac3 (you could just stream copy) then combine the audio into the mkv with mkvmerge, little bit fiddly but only add's about 20mins to the process (less with my new pc yay for core 2 duo)

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:36
As EPiPHONE already replied, all i will say is that i demux video to mkv and audio to ac3 (you could just stream copy) then combine the audio into the mkv with mkvmerge, little bit fiddly but only add's about 20mins to the process (less with my new pc yay for core 2 duo)

Yea, see, no, that's exactly what I don't want. MKV is useless to me if it doesn't support HD audio. I didn't just get an Onkyo 606 with fully HDMI and HD audio support so I could be stuck with ac3 and dts. :) Hence I'll stick to my ISO method. That allows me to keep FULL quality. With HD audio.

dat720
30th June 2008, 03:38
You should be able to drop amy stream into a mkv, as long as your pc has codec's to play it back,

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:43
Time for me to go learn more about MKV I think. And the problem is that PowerDVD doesn't support MKV and it doesn't share its codecs with others. The whole HD game is a pain due to all the protection crap they have on it. And I don't just mean AACS. PowerDVD and their protected audio path nonsense is going to make me have to get a new sound card if I want HDMI unmolested audio. Something like this:

http://www.auzentech.com/site/company/press.php

What a real pain. I just want to enjoy the best picture and sound that my equipment allows. So, ISOs for me...still the easiest method IMO that allows for the highest possible quality.

dat720
30th June 2008, 03:46
Fair nuts, i always say use what works, there is no right and wrong, i was just sharing my experiences with mkv.

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:48
Yup, and I definitely appreciate that. I wanted to know more about it to see if it was a possible solution for me and then I realized even if it can do the streams I want, I can't play them anyway. SIGH. What a nightmare! The price for being on the bleeding edge.

dat720
30th June 2008, 03:52
Yup, its a problem, it's the same with any new technology, we just have to wait and hope that the cluey guys find good solution's :) i am extremely impressed with the current level of software available, 12 months ago it was a real nightmare to convert a hd/br to avi or just plain do anything with them.

And all i have to say about it is EAC3TO rocks, madshi is a legend!!! and i can't wait till he supports dropping audio streams to mkv in the same pass!!! :)

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 03:57
I have to completely agree. The state of tools right now is amazing given the complexity. Another year from now and I can imagine we might have some one click solutions similar to CloneDVD and DVD Shrink now. Being able to keep the menus and special features while dropping previews and other crap...that'd be really sweet. But *VERY* difficult to do I think. Plus we need faster machines for reencoding and all that if we want to shrink stuff down to a single layer. I suspect burning will be in the cards as media prices fall. We'll get to the level we want to be at some day. But so far, amazing progress. The seamless branching thing was a royal pain even 6 months ago. Now with eac3to, it's SO much easier. And when the other tools incorporate that kind of thing into their own code, we'll be even closer.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 04:03
So, I've not been able to make a working rattatouille even though I can now generate one big .m2ts file. The audio just wont sync up right.... :(

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 04:05
Give the exact steps you're using.

laserfan
30th June 2008, 04:14
My wish would be that the "videosphere" (the active community of vid enthusiasts and the related businesses) would all get on the same page as far as a @#%@^% standardized "container" for streams and just use that one!!!You are hopelessly mistaken if you believe this is ever going to happen. The fact is that there aren't three people among the entire Doom9 population who have exactly the same interests, desires, & goals for their video setups.

Decide what you want, and figure-out how best to get it. All the tools are here.

dat720
30th June 2008, 04:32
Exactly, different container's suit different task's, same with video and audio codec's, a vendor saw a gap to fill and created a product to fill that gap!

Your just damn out of luck as far as creating 1 standard for video's go, it just does not work, It's like VOB and EVOB, VOB could not support HD DVD resolution's and bitrate's so the EVOB standard was developed, as technology changes and evolves so does the delivery methods. MP3 is lucky it has been around as long as it has, it is a format that gained popularity and has just stuck around because of that, same as xvid and divx.

setarip_old
30th June 2008, 04:46
@ben_franklin

Hi!So, I've not been able to make a working rattatouille even though I can now generate one big .m2ts file. The audio just wont sync up right...

The following thread includes posting by "spexman" who indicates that his/her backup of the Bluray "Ratatouille" suffers only from banding in one scene. presumably, this means that all other aspects, including synch, are okay. You might want to communicate with "spexman" to find out how this was accomplished.

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=139014&highlight=ratatouille

EPiPH0NE
30th June 2008, 04:58
So, I've not been able to make a working rattatouille even though I can now generate one big .m2ts file. The audio just wont sync up right.... :(

This has AVC + seamless branching this method should work:

1) Use eac3to to join the video files to MKV and if your using the LPCM or AC3 track you will need to join it to a new LPCM/AC3 track via eac3to which can be done at the same time as the MKV. You will need to run the command line twice if gaps are found in the audio. This all made much easier by using Eac3to_And_More_GUI.

2) Load your MKV into tsMuxeR which contains your properly joined AVC video track then your new audio track -> mux to M2TS

You should now having a working M2TS that's in synch.

dat720
30th June 2008, 05:17
Already suggested using eac3to in post #83, i assume he either did not read the post, did not try the method, or it didn't work....

Anyone else noticing this thread going no where? after 100 post's and what seems to be about 4 different subject's it just doesnt seem to be happening for him!

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 16:15
Give the exact steps you're using.

anydvd > harddisk

TSmuxer > open playlist > select vid stream + PCM

Mux to m2ts

open m2ts with TMPGenc and encode.

---------------------------------------------

With that said, the way I did it last week was different, pre "new version" of TMPGenc. The earlier version wouldnt read audio out of the m2ts file so I would just demux the audio and encode seperately, then mux the two together with Windows media encoder tools.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 16:21
You are hopelessly mistaken if you believe this is ever going to happen.
I wouldn't say "never". The music industry finally woke up and now they are selling mp3's on amazon. I think at some point they'll start selling movies in 720p and make their way up to 1080p. In the mean time, I'll just have to keep buying these silly Bluray disks.... :(

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 16:34
anydvd > harddisk

TSmuxer > open playlist > select vid stream + PCM

Mux to m2ts

open m2ts with TMPGenc and encode.

---------------------------------------------

With that said, the way I did it last week was different, pre "new version" of TMPGenc. The earlier version wouldnt read audio out of the m2ts file so I would just demux the audio and encode seperately, then mux the two together with Windows media encoder tools.

What MPLS file are you opening? It makes a difference on that disc.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 16:41
What MPLS file are you opening? It makes a difference on that disc.

I'll cut and paste the eac3to results so you can see it....

SamuriHL
30th June 2008, 16:42
Somehow I doubt the sync issues are happening in the m2ts file that's output by tsmuxer. I've output a movie only BD structure of that movie with no problems at all.

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 18:28
1) 00001.mpls (angle 1), 1:50:33
[27+28+0+1+2+5+8+9+12+13+16+18+21+17+33+34+49+37+50+40+51+43+52+46+53+56+54+59+55+62+65].m2ts
- h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
- RAW/PCM, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, French, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, Spanish, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

2) 00001.mpls (angle 2), 1:50:33
[27+29+0+3+2+6+8+10+12+14+16+19+21+31+33+35+49+38+50+41+51+44+52+47+53+57+54+60+55+63+65].m2ts
- h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
- RAW/PCM, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, French, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, Spanish, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

3) 00001.mpls (angle 3), 1:50:33
[27+30+0+4+2+7+8+11+12+15+16+20+21+32+33+36+49+39+50+42+51+45+52+48+53+58+54+61+55+64+65].m2ts
- h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
- RAW/PCM, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, French, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, Spanish, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

4) 00137.mpls, 0:50:58
[143+144+83+145+146+147+148+149+150+151].m2ts
- MPEG2, 480i30 /1.001 (16:9)
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

5) 00012.mpls, 00021.m2ts, 0:28:00
- h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
- RAW/PCM, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, French, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, Spanish, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

6) 00017.mpls, 00033.m2ts, 0:26:23
- h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
- RAW/PCM, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, French, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, Spanish, multi-channel, 48khz
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

7) 00056.mpls, 00081.m2ts+00082.m2ts+00080.m2ts, 0:15:06
- MPEG2, 480i30 /1.001 (16:9)
- AC3, English, stereo, 48khz

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 18:31
Obviously I am using 00001.mpls. However, I don't suppose there is an option in TSmuxer to tell it which "angle" in the playlist to use??? :)

setarip_old
30th June 2008, 18:35
@ben_franklin

Have you as yet followed my suggestion in post #100 of this thread?

ben_franklin
30th June 2008, 20:04
@ben_franklin

Have you as yet followed my suggestion in post #100 of this thread?

I will send him a PM.

ben_franklin
1st July 2008, 18:12
While I wait for a reply, how has everyone else dealt with the audio issues???

EPiPH0NE
2nd July 2008, 02:44
While I wait for a reply, how has everyone else dealt with the audio issues???


If you just follow what we all of us have told you then you shouldn't even be having any issues. You're either not following what we have told you or your hardware can't handle the playback. Using eac3to you won't have any audio issues.

ben_franklin
2nd July 2008, 03:48
If you just follow what we all of us have told you then you shouldn't even be having any issues. You're either not following what we have told you or your hardware can't handle the playback. Using eac3to you won't have any audio issues.

Really, I used eac3to to select the audio stream and used the LPCM, then tried the AC3 for laughs and none of it synced up. Since your the expert and this is quite trivial to you, then you shouldn't have any trouble describing exactly what you did to make it work should you? :)

EPiPH0NE
2nd July 2008, 04:47
Really, I used eac3to to select the audio stream and used the LPCM, then tried the AC3 for laughs and none of it synced up. Since your the expert and this is quite trivial to you, then you shouldn't have any trouble describing exactly what you did to make it work should you? :)


It's already explained in post #101 and I believe post #88. I am not an 'expert' but having been ripping for just about 8 years and reading Doom9 since '01 I may know a little something. Now if you excuse me it's t0ke time :)

dat720
2nd July 2008, 09:22
Try using eac3to in this fashion...
eac3to.exe d: 1)

Paste the results here, replace d: with your br drive letter.

then you shouldn't have any trouble describing exactly what you did to make it work should you?

you need to do some trail and error of your own and find a method that actually work's you can't just rely on other people to tell you how to do it everytime, many different methods have been described for you and after 115 post's you are still having problems.......