PDA

View Full Version : Fastest Lossless Video Codec


lubczyk
15th March 2008, 15:55
I have a lot of soft-subbed h.264 in mkv files that I want to hardsub so that i can view on my PS3. I obviously add borders and use textsub to compensate for overscan and make permanent subtitles.

The problem arises when I'm ready to transcode:

- Transcoding to x264 in lossless mode is way too slow - about 1 hour, 40 minutes for 24 minutes of video.

- WMV9 Advanced 100% VBR Mode is faster but still takes 50 minutes for 24 minutes of video.

So that leaves me with Divx 6 and Xvid. Do either of these codecs have a lossless mode? IF they do, how fast are they compared to WMV9 and x264?

Sharktooth
15th March 2008, 16:10
no...
but you can use x264 lossless with lighter settings and gain a lot of speed.

lexor
15th March 2008, 19:53
Will PS3 even play lossless? Did you try a sample?

Dark Shikari
15th March 2008, 19:57
WMV9 100% quality isn't lossless.

Blue_MiSfit
15th March 2008, 20:14
no...
but you can use x264 lossless with lighter settings and gain a lot of speed.
__________________


Yep. Do it. Provided you're okay with the large file sizes associated with lossless. Is it really necessary? I would just re-encode at like CRF18 with all fast options.

Too bad the 360 can't display text subs!

~MiSfit

Ranguvar
18th March 2008, 01:54
ffdshow VfW's HuffYUV can be very fast.

I normally avoid MSU tests, but: http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/lossless_codecs_2007_en.html

TEB
19th March 2008, 13:21
Hi. Prolly a silly question explaining the foundation of my x264 newbishness. ;) but is there only "one" lossless mode for x264 or do the various parameters give a different speed/compression ratio but still beeing lossless ?
If so; anyone care to post a couple of "ok" lossless parameter suggestions like a "fast" one and a "archive" one ?

Best regards
TEB

PS! The content we use is digibeta 4:2:2 as source via a NLE