PDA

View Full Version : multiplex / de-multiplex

jimmy
10th January 2002, 20:39
Why use bbmpeg for this?

Aside of excellent cutting, is there any other advantages to using bbmpeg?

jimmy
24hourloop
10th January 2002, 21:26
Why not?
PoKKeNoiSe
11th January 2002, 09:58
Muxed mpegs (for svcd) are smaller then muxed with TMPGenc.

And it says if your bitrate is to low, underflow or some thing like that(it means your mpeg is not a suitable svcd)
waldok
11th January 2002, 10:14
Why use bbMPEG ? Strange question when you don't suggest any other tool instead ?

Well, as far as I'm concerned, I use it for its muxing speed, progress bar while muxing (makes you believe it's getting faster...), precise cutting functionality, easy to use parameters, and informative window (when underflows occur).

Well, damn, now that I read what I just wrote, I just discovered I love bbMpeg :D

By the way, I also use a tool called bbdemux (DOS command line) for demuwing, which is quite fast (no progress bar though...)

Have fun

Waldok.:cool:
24hourloop
11th January 2002, 20:18
Originally posted by jimmy
Why use bbmpeg for this?

Aside of excellent cutting, is there any other advantages to using bbmpeg?

jimmy

I think it is proper to say that it is a robust and matured tool. TMPGenc has problems cutting. When muxing it gives you all sorts of options that may or may not be important to you. It allows you to specify audio and video offset. It's hard to complain about it.

The only thing I'd like to see is that it could be a standalone function but that is really pretty unimportant.
twistee
12th January 2002, 14:31
I have found bbmpeg to be very good. i only had one problem with it. with one movie i made it refused to muliplex it...it would just finish checking the audio and then stop. but that hasnt happened since...
jimmy
13th January 2002, 15:09
waldok stated:

Why use bbMPEG ? Strange question when you don't suggest any other tool instead ?
I didn't suggest any other tool because other people told me to "never mind other programs, just use bbmpeg because it's the best"

And it works well, because I have had absolutely NO problems with any svcd's I have done.

I appreciate your help everyone, thanks :)

jimmy
stanleycup
28th February 2002, 16:14
I have an m1v and mp2 file that I would like to mux using bbmpeg.

How long should it take? The file is 44 minutes long

When I tried it, it took 1 1/2 hours to do. Seems like an awfully
long time to mux.

I have an Thunderbird 1.2 gig with 512 megs RAM. I would have thought
it would take a lot less time to mux a 45 minute file.

Any suggestions of what I may be doing wrong?
Evaldas
28th February 2002, 17:18
Definitely you are doing something wrong. To mux 2 hour movie for me takes about 5-10 minutes (I never looked at the clock).
Read the doom9 guide, how to mux with bbMpeg.
FakerZ
28th February 2002, 17:33
Same for me. BB is a fast, easy and reliable tool. Never had a problem :)
stanleycup
28th February 2002, 19:21
I can't seem to locate the bbmpeg guide. Just looked in the guides section and I couldn't find it.

Can you give me the exact link?

Thanks
NeWcS
28th February 2002, 23:58
Originally posted by jimmy
Why use bbmpeg for this?

Aside of excellent cutting, is there any other advantages to using bbmpeg?

jimmy

I think you answered your own question!!! 'excellent cutting'

Thats why I use it