ilovejedd
26th January 2008, 06:03
Well, not exactly a Grandma PC, it's more of a Mom PC.
I'm looking to build a new PC for my mom using left over funds from the file server I'm building. She doesn't really need a top of the line model. Just something that works better than the one she's using now.
Current config:
Case: Generic MicroATX w/250W PSU
Motherboard: DFI CM33-SC (VIA PLE133/686A chipset)
CPU: Pentium III 733 MHz
RAM: 256MB PC133 SDRAM
HDD: Seagate 20GB
Optical: 8x/4x Sony CD-R/W
Video: integrated
Audio: integrated
OS: Win98SE
I was considering buying an off the shelf bargain-basement PC but I couldn't find any good deals so I figured I'd just build one myself.
Requirements:
1) small form factor/space saving
2) low power consumption
3) ~$300 total (tax+S&H included)
I made a bunch of configurations and now, I can't decide which one to go with. Links to the shared wish list for each config are as follows:
Mini ITX BLKD201GLY2 Celeron 220 1.2GHz 19W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=10247187) - $251.45
pros:
-lowest power consumption based on parts specs
cons:
-least powerful
-not upgradeable
Micro ATX Celeron 420 Conroe-L 1.6GHz 35W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8179608) - $254.94
pros:
-supports up to Q6600
-Gigabit LAN
cons:
-no Wolfdale support
Micro ATX Sempron LE-1100 1.9GHz 45W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8178788) - $255.94
pros:
-supports most current AMD processors
-possible Phenom support
cons:
-max 2GB RAM
Micro ATX Athlon LE-1620 2.4GHz 45W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8178648) - $270.94
-same as above Sempron build, but with better processor
I'm not really up to date with all the latest hardware so most of the components were chosen based on Newegg reviews and price. During the course of my "research", it was quite easy to find benchmarks for mid-range to high-end processors. Unfortunately, the same could not be said for the really low-end segment.
The computer will be used primarily for internet, email and some word processing and spreadsheets. Gaming, if you can call it that, is limited to Spider Solitaire, Freecell and Hearts. Video related tasks would mostly be watching on YouTube. The PC will probably be left on most of the time but with auto-suspend feature enabled. Given the above, I thought it more prudent to stick to a single core (not to mention there weren't any dual core CPUs under $50). Besides, the Micro ATX builds all support dual and/or quad-core processors if ever the need to upgrade arises.
Right now, I'm leaning towards the mATX Celeron 420. On paper, it looks to be a good balance between power consumption, performance and upgradeability. Unfortunately, I still haven't found real-world power consumption comparisons.
Thoughts, comments, violent reactions? Anyone?
I'm looking to build a new PC for my mom using left over funds from the file server I'm building. She doesn't really need a top of the line model. Just something that works better than the one she's using now.
Current config:
Case: Generic MicroATX w/250W PSU
Motherboard: DFI CM33-SC (VIA PLE133/686A chipset)
CPU: Pentium III 733 MHz
RAM: 256MB PC133 SDRAM
HDD: Seagate 20GB
Optical: 8x/4x Sony CD-R/W
Video: integrated
Audio: integrated
OS: Win98SE
I was considering buying an off the shelf bargain-basement PC but I couldn't find any good deals so I figured I'd just build one myself.
Requirements:
1) small form factor/space saving
2) low power consumption
3) ~$300 total (tax+S&H included)
I made a bunch of configurations and now, I can't decide which one to go with. Links to the shared wish list for each config are as follows:
Mini ITX BLKD201GLY2 Celeron 220 1.2GHz 19W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=10247187) - $251.45
pros:
-lowest power consumption based on parts specs
cons:
-least powerful
-not upgradeable
Micro ATX Celeron 420 Conroe-L 1.6GHz 35W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8179608) - $254.94
pros:
-supports up to Q6600
-Gigabit LAN
cons:
-no Wolfdale support
Micro ATX Sempron LE-1100 1.9GHz 45W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8178788) - $255.94
pros:
-supports most current AMD processors
-possible Phenom support
cons:
-max 2GB RAM
Micro ATX Athlon LE-1620 2.4GHz 45W (http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/wishlist/PublicWishDetail.asp?WishListNumber=8178648) - $270.94
-same as above Sempron build, but with better processor
I'm not really up to date with all the latest hardware so most of the components were chosen based on Newegg reviews and price. During the course of my "research", it was quite easy to find benchmarks for mid-range to high-end processors. Unfortunately, the same could not be said for the really low-end segment.
The computer will be used primarily for internet, email and some word processing and spreadsheets. Gaming, if you can call it that, is limited to Spider Solitaire, Freecell and Hearts. Video related tasks would mostly be watching on YouTube. The PC will probably be left on most of the time but with auto-suspend feature enabled. Given the above, I thought it more prudent to stick to a single core (not to mention there weren't any dual core CPUs under $50). Besides, the Micro ATX builds all support dual and/or quad-core processors if ever the need to upgrade arises.
Right now, I'm leaning towards the mATX Celeron 420. On paper, it looks to be a good balance between power consumption, performance and upgradeability. Unfortunately, I still haven't found real-world power consumption comparisons.
Thoughts, comments, violent reactions? Anyone?