soundboy
13th January 2008, 10:11
Hi,
I'm editing a concert video and I'm taking my first steps into 5.1 audio. I got a good quality stereo track from the concert and upmixed it to 5.1 by following the steps in several guides I found on this board, especially this one (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=59949)
Now, after filtering and separating the different frequencies from my audio, I ended up with my 6 mono WAV files. So far so good. I encoded the 6 wav files into a single AC3 file, using BeSweet with the BeSweet GUI (following the directions in SurroundBoy's guide). Now, what puzzles me is that the mono WAVs are about 560 MB each, and the new encoded AC3 is less than 140 MB. (at 384 kbps, 48kHz)... is that right? Now, I'm kinda screwed because I don't have a proper 5.1 setup in my house to test the sound, but through my PC's 2.1 speakers and my TV's normal stereo speakers, the stereo track sounds much better than the 5.1 AC3 track. I just want to know, is this all normal?
I'm editing a concert video and I'm taking my first steps into 5.1 audio. I got a good quality stereo track from the concert and upmixed it to 5.1 by following the steps in several guides I found on this board, especially this one (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=59949)
Now, after filtering and separating the different frequencies from my audio, I ended up with my 6 mono WAV files. So far so good. I encoded the 6 wav files into a single AC3 file, using BeSweet with the BeSweet GUI (following the directions in SurroundBoy's guide). Now, what puzzles me is that the mono WAVs are about 560 MB each, and the new encoded AC3 is less than 140 MB. (at 384 kbps, 48kHz)... is that right? Now, I'm kinda screwed because I don't have a proper 5.1 setup in my house to test the sound, but through my PC's 2.1 speakers and my TV's normal stereo speakers, the stereo track sounds much better than the 5.1 AC3 track. I just want to know, is this all normal?