PDA

View Full Version : is there a program that use cce as encoder besides dvd rb?


salman1
1st October 2007, 23:07
Hi, is there a program that use cce as encoder besides dvd rb and able to use avisynth script because dvd rb is running slow and i don't use strong filter i just use light filter and i don't do deinterlacing? thanks

SallyDog
2nd October 2007, 16:51
dvd2svcd (but I don't know why it would be any faster/slower than rb

or, just load avs file directly into cce

salman1
2nd October 2007, 22:47
yes but if i load avs in cce how do i do audio? plus does dvd2svcd produce .vob file as output? thanks

SallyDog
3rd October 2007, 01:43
yes but if i load avs in cce how do i do audio? plus does dvd2svcd produce .vob file as output? thanks

There are certainly ways to do audio, and yes, dvd2svcd will produce vob files, but I guess I'm still missing the point.

If you are using CCE with a avs script, the speed should not be dependent on the "engine" (rd, dvd2svcd, ect).

Maybe it would help if you posted your avs script and someone with more knowledge than me could see if it could be optimized.

salman1
3rd October 2007, 02:48
ya it just 3 passes encoding and limitedsharpenfaster() but let me first try dvd2svcd and see. thanks

is dvd2svcd use avisynth script to encode ?

SallyDog
3rd October 2007, 12:47
ya it just 3 passes encoding and limitedsharpenfaster() but let me first try dvd2svcd and see. thanks

is dvd2svcd use avisynth script to encode ?

dvd2svcd indeed uses an avs script. It creates it's own script, but you have the option to edit it while processing. When you install d2s, make sure to install the Roba plugin, and try using that to encode. If you're currently running 3 passes in cce, it really means you are running 4 (the first one analyzes the video). Roba will cut this down to 1 pass total, and processing should be completed in 1/4 the time it takes with 3 passes.

More info available the dvd2svc category.

manono
6th October 2007, 06:07
ya it just 3 passes encoding and limitedsharpenfaster()
The request was for the script, not a statement. But assuming that's all there is in the script besides the basics, LSF probably doubles the encoding time. Try encoding without it and see if you're happy with the encoding speed.

And as stated before, no other front end will give you faster results if using the same CCE with the same settings and the same script.

And you might try encoding directly in CCE. Ignore the audio and add it in during the muxing/authoring stage.