Compatibility ml3dex (medianblur plugin) and MVtools

[yup]

Hi folk.
Please advise, can I use MVTools from Fizick for ml3dex function from Medianblur plugin or I neeed use Manao version MVTools.
With kind regards yup.

[yup]

Hi all!
Very difficult or stupid question:) ?
Please reply.

[Mug Funky]

you could fake it by turning motion compensation off in ml3dex and using your own mocomp interleaved clip. certainly you'll get better wuality that way (at the cost of loads of speed).

by "mocomp interleaved", i mean combining several mvcompensates with interleave(clip1,clip2,clip3,etc), running ml3dex, then using selectevery(n,floor(n/2)) after it to get the original framecount back.

[yup]

Hi Mug Funky!:thanks:
I spent some time for finding plugin for remove black lines from analogue capture source. Ml3dex give good results. Before I try use combination MVTools with DegrainMedian with small picture quality improvement. if I right understand You recomend use ml3dex without motion compensation instead DegrainMedian? Minimum quantity motion compensated frame need 2 or 4? This script right?
AviSource("seldv2.avi")
AssumeBFF()
SeparateFields()
SelectEven ()
source=ConvertToYV12()
bv1 = source.MVAnalyse(isb = true, truemotion=true, delta =1, idx = 1, overlap=4,dct=2)
fv1 = source.MVAnalyse(isb = false, truemotion=true, delta = 1, idx = 1, overlap=4, dct=2)
bc1 =source.MVFlow(bv1, idx=2, thSCD1=1000)
fc1 = source.MVFlow(fv1, idx=2, thSCD1=1000)
interleave(bc1, source, fc1)
ml3dex()
Only for for one fields.
With kind regards yup.

[yup]

Sorry!
bc1 =source.MVFlow(bv1, idx=1, thSCD1=1000)
fc1 = source.MVFlow(fv1, idx=1, thSCD1=1000)
yup.

[tsp]

yup: MugFunky suggest using MVTools directly instead of letting ml3dex calling it. It will give a better result as I haven't updated ml3dex to use fizicks version of MVTools. You are still missing a selectevery(3,1) at the end in the script.

[yup]

Hi tsp!
Yes SelectEvery(3,1) last line in my script.
Thank You for reply. I spending some time for reading thesis http://www.mee.tcd.ie/~ack/papers/a4ackphd.ps.gz. I understand that I need use 3 frames (1 previous, source and 1 next). also i read that ml3dex not sense to error motion estimation and now try different parametr MVAnalyse. tsp MVTools very popular plugin, very processor power consumable and until not exist GPU version:) .
With kind regards yup.

[tsp]

yup: yes it might be a good idea to see if it possible to speed up mvtools using GPU acceleration. I might want to try to see if it is feasible to do.

[Mug Funky]

@ tsp:

if you can get realtime mvdegraining via GPU on big frames, you'll be the queen of summertime :)