Lord Sandwich
29th December 2001, 13:24
Given that the source is DV, is there any real difference in capture quality between these three inputs?
I know Composite has the worst picture quality in theory, S-Video is much better, and DV is pixel-perfect to the tape, but I've never seen a side-by-side comparison of the three. Hell, I don't even notice the difference between Composite and S-Video! :D
I capture at up to 768x576i with a BT878 card; does it really get much better than this? Enough to justify a $1,000+ Matrox/Pinnacle card?
I know Composite has the worst picture quality in theory, S-Video is much better, and DV is pixel-perfect to the tape, but I've never seen a side-by-side comparison of the three. Hell, I don't even notice the difference between Composite and S-Video! :D
I capture at up to 768x576i with a BT878 card; does it really get much better than this? Enough to justify a $1,000+ Matrox/Pinnacle card?