hifi
26th February 2007, 13:37
The blocky dark scenes in x264 videos have been annoying me for some time, until i finally searched this board and found a solution.
I've been using aq patched x264 for a while now, and i like it (thanks Sharktooth!).
The question is - should I also try deadzones?
As far as i understand, both aq and deadzones work in quite similar way, redistributing quantizer values more evenly between parts of the frame that are considered more and less important by the x264 encoder. Am I right?
Which of these options works better for encoding with DVD-resoultion at 1500-2000 kbit/s?
It would be nice if someone explained to me the difference between aq and dz.
Videos I usually compress contain not much action, but many important details in the background. A good example is David Lynch's Blue Velvet :)
I've been using aq patched x264 for a while now, and i like it (thanks Sharktooth!).
The question is - should I also try deadzones?
As far as i understand, both aq and deadzones work in quite similar way, redistributing quantizer values more evenly between parts of the frame that are considered more and less important by the x264 encoder. Am I right?
Which of these options works better for encoding with DVD-resoultion at 1500-2000 kbit/s?
It would be nice if someone explained to me the difference between aq and dz.
Videos I usually compress contain not much action, but many important details in the background. A good example is David Lynch's Blue Velvet :)