PDA

View Full Version : How long does it take to convert a DVD to AVI on Core2Duo ?


pynex
18th November 2006, 11:30
Hello !

I just want to know - how long does it take to convert a episode of a series (like 24 oder Battlestar Galactica) on a Core2Duo 6300 or higher ?

original: DVD, 40 min,AC3
AVI: 350 MB, MP3 128 Kbit

Is it much faster, when you enable more than 1 thread in xvid ?

Many thanks in advance,

Pynex

len0x
19th November 2006, 16:20
something like 17-18 min on 6400 with 640 width (two threads which does matter)...

BigDid
19th November 2006, 17:12
Hi and welcome to the forum.

You also can have a look on these benches, even in french will give you relations between AMD and C2D dual cores and monocores:

http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/306/merom-et-conroe-test-des-core-2-duo/page8.php
or more recent:
http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/346/intel-core-2-extreme-quad-core-qx6700/page7.php

Did

pynex
20th November 2006, 07:27
something like 17-18 min on 6400 with 640 width (two threads which does matter)...
wow - that's quick - many thanks for your answer.

Hi and welcome to the forum.

You also can have a look on these benches, even in french will give you relations between AMD and C2D dual cores and monocores:

Ah, very informative - because of the comparison to P4, too. Thanks.

Pynex

Mary H
10th December 2006, 20:13
Is it much faster, when you enable more than 1 thread in xvid ?

I just got a Core 2 Duo 6600. Pardon my ignorance, but how do I enable more than one thread in Xvid? An encode of the size described above takes almost 2 hours, which is much faster than it was on my old P4, but it sounds like I could get a lot more speed by making this change.

len0x
13th December 2006, 20:45
if you're using latest AutoGK this is done automatically...

Mary H
14th December 2006, 00:21
Still with 2.27, I changed xvid encoder config to 2 threads setting. Time went down to 45 minutes for the same episode that before took two hours. (688 width, 4:3 AR, 400 MB size, 6600 core 2 duo)

Upgraded to 2.37b, time is still 45 minutes.

Nice increase from two hours, but still not close to the 17-18 minutes mentioned above.

len0x
15th December 2006, 19:48
Width of 688 at 4:3 has approximately 45% more pixels to encode comparing to width of 640 with 16:9 that I described, so no wonder (my timings also include no audio transcoding, no deinterlacing, no color correction).

Mary H
15th December 2006, 19:55
Width of 688 at 4:3 has approximately 45% more pixels to encode comparing to width of 640 with 16:9 that I described, so no wonder (my timings also include no audio transcoding, no deinterlacing, no color correction).

OK, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!

I'm pretty new at xvid and AutoGK, but learning fast. :D Great program, btw!

pynex
18th December 2006, 18:24
(my timings also include no audio transcoding, no deinterlacing, no color correction).

O.K. - I was wondering, why it takes 50 min on my computer. Without all the other stuff, it takes 20-23 minutes.

len0x
18th December 2006, 18:51
yep, the rest of the difference is due to very aggressive memory settings and overclocking :)

ghastly
4th September 2007, 02:42
How do you enable multithreading for Xvid encoding? It takes forever to encode even 10 minutes of video and I have a core 2 duo processor... I think I'm doing something wrong.