PDA

View Full Version : DivX 6.2.5 now available


DigitAl56K
15th June 2006, 03:03
DivX 6.2.5 has just been released and features much enhanced post-processing and playback performance.

You can see benchmarks and an interactive demo of the new post-processing here:
http://www.divx.com/divx/windows/codec/features/

This point release is decoder-centric.

fight2win
15th June 2006, 06:57
rock on dude, that post processing sharpening feature rock, by the way, how can i make my dvd to divx encodes sharper during encoding, using mpeg-2 quantization, or that enhance texture feature, or both?

CruNcher
15th June 2006, 10:20
DigitAl56K is this somekind of SeeSaw implementation ?
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=104701

Kostarum Rex Persia
15th June 2006, 17:13
@ DigitAl56K

Can you make a update patch from DivX Pro 6.22 to DivX Pro 6.25. I can't download 14.2 MB.

Sagittaire
15th June 2006, 19:02
DigitAl56K is this somekind of SeeSaw implementation ?
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=104701

"Full Deblocking with Sharpening"

Perhaps special PP4 with very better high frequencies preservation. If yes metric would be better. If not it's just post process sharpening filter like xsharpen or msharpen in ffdshow. Anyway "sujective quality improvement" seem really good.

CruNcher
15th June 2006, 20:00
Sagittaire yep it definately looks better for High Bitrate this appears to me to be somekind of H.263 Matrix Blur workaround. DivX Inc seems to fear AVC, it doesn't seem to work on the DCT level tough, so only a post pro filter in the Decoder, nevertheless it seems it doesn't really preserve details, so it's a trick :P
calling this Sharpening hmmm not sure maybe Blur On/Off would be a better name for it ;)

Warrex
15th June 2006, 20:07
The interactive demo looks absolutely spectacular!

Unfortunately I do not get the same results when using the new decoder. The frames look even more blurred when using "Full Deblocking with Sharpening" compared to "No postprocessing". Tried several 720x400 files (1500kb/s-2500kb/s). Film effect was turned off.

Is there a way to test "Sharpening" without "Automatic Deblocking" turned on?

DigitAl56K
15th June 2006, 20:43
Warrex - Make sure you rebooted after installation if prompted so that your DirectShow decoder is updated. You should definately see the effect.

Sagittaire: It is a post-processing effect. You will find metric to be lower but subjective much better, as you're seeing :)

CruNcher: I haven't heard of SeeSaw before, I'll take a look at it.

P.S. Hah! @ Blur on/off ;) The decoder is enhancing details on playback, so we can do this for any DivX video.

Warrex
15th June 2006, 23:10
Actually I did reboot twice since I installed 6.2.5. However for some mysterious reasons I had to un-/reinstall DivX to get it working.

Looks sweet! Great job!

falcon2000eg
16th June 2006, 00:01
@ DigitAl56K

Can you make a update patch from DivX Pro 6.22 to DivX Pro 6.25. I can't download 14.2 MB.

same here

DigitAl56K
16th June 2006, 01:24
Sure, I can work on that. Time allowing, I'll get something up on DivX Labs tomorrow and post the link.

Soulhunter
16th June 2006, 07:29
Lol, thats the first time I installed DivX since 5.2 ;D

- XviD source (http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/1728/4norm7wx.jpg)
- Decoded via DivX + its sharpening (http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/6310/4sharp1uv.jpg)

- XviD source (http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/3084/3norm5hw.jpg)
- Decoded via DivX + its sharpening (http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/329/3sharp4fj.jpg)

Hmm, slight ringing... >.>

But better than conventional sharpening it seems!


Bye

IgorC
16th June 2006, 09:47
New 6.2.5 decoder is 29% faster here.

Comparing it with old measures http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=813278#post813278

MPEG4 video (no GMC no qpel)
Divx decoder custom+full deblock - 54.2 - 54.5 fps
Divx decoder full+sharp - 39.2-39.3 fps
ffdshow mpeg-4 decoder PP2 - 72.0 - 76.5 fps

AVC video ( encoder: x264 full featured High Profile)
CoreAVC decoder (standart deblocking) - 54.3 - 55.2 fps

New sharp feature rings a lot.
Sharp of the details isn't the same thing with the sharp of edge contrast.

Looking at screenshots it is impossible to see ringing and another issues of this kind of sharp. I didn't test it at high bitrates but at 650-700 kbit/s it had too much contrast.

CruNcher
17th June 2006, 03:31
Yep it's got faster but CoreASP is still the fastest :)

ChronoCross
17th June 2006, 05:15
Yep it's got faster but CoreASP is still the fastest :)

see that's no fair if you've used it already because it's not public yet lol

DigitAl56K
20th June 2006, 06:28
For those bandwidth afflicted folks who asked, here (http://download.divx.com/labs/DivXcodecUnofficial625Patch.exe) is an absolutely unofficial and unsupported update patch from codec 6.2.2 that I whipped up tonight. Hope it helps :)

Kostarum Rex Persia
22nd June 2006, 01:35
DigitAl56K, just one little question fot you: that update patch which you so kindly provided, is it update to 6.25 or 6.25.17, which is bugfixed version.

DigitAl56K
22nd June 2006, 01:53
6.2.5.17 :)

Dyolfknip
24th June 2006, 20:55
I opened an AVS script in lastest version of VirtualDub (1.6.15 stable) and selected DivX 6.2.5 as video codec. Codec properties window opened as it should. Then i decided to use presets and I set the slider to far right (quality 10). Then I wanted to change max keyframe interval and un-cheked the presets checkbox on main tab. Then I set max keyframe interval to 240 frames and clicked OK (settings seemed to be OK at this point). After that I decided to check the settings once more and noticed that encoding mode was set to Balanced (it was insane before i clicked ok) and quantization mode was set to h.263 (was h.263 optimized). Other options like bitrate were just fine.

BetaBoy
25th June 2006, 16:53
Yep it's got faster but CoreASP is still the fastest :)
CruNcher... play nice ;-)

CruNcher
26th June 2006, 18:01
hey i allways do and it's the truth :D

hmm i wonder no press release on DivX page about this http://www.sonic.com/about/press/news/2006/06/divxVideo.aspx
:P