PDA

View Full Version : porn bad quality / else good quality


ipfreak
12th December 2001, 13:08
Hi all.

Don't know why but when coding porn movies
the DivX looks very bad. I mean it has stripes and blocks
if the actors move too fast. ;))

But when using same encoding settings and making
for example "American History X" everything looks very cool
with best quality.

I use:
DivX 4.11 TWO PASS
1800 KBit video
128 KBit audio

Do they have secial protection ???
Any ideas ??


Thx, ip



---
who the fuck is general failure
and why is he reading my harddisk
---

bb
12th December 2001, 14:40
I think it's because watching porn videos is a sin :eek:

Haha, seriously: You'll probably need to deinterlace, try smartdeinterlace or GreedyHMA.

bb

Corrado
12th December 2001, 17:03
Originally posted by bb
I think it's because watching porn videos is a sin :eek:

LOL :D

UHT
12th December 2001, 21:31
maybe its cos there is a lot of fast action... or so i heard :)

Kandor
13th December 2001, 04:37
do a deinterlace otherwise it will look like shit.
and greedyhma is ivtc and no pornmovies are telecined that I know of.

wmansir
13th December 2001, 05:40
It works fine on gay porn. (just kidding)

GreedyHMA is both IVTC and deinterlace depending on the settings.
but kandor is right, it was probably filmed on video and just needs deinterlacing.

ipfreak
13th December 2001, 09:23
Will try to deinterlace.

trbarry
14th December 2001, 15:52
Official GreedyHMA porn rip settings (assuming TopFirst); ;)

GreedyHMA(1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0)

This will actually cause it to to be automatic, doing pulldown matching on film material that isn't really there. But on still or slow motion scenes it will have more detail this way. If it still lets through too many motion/weave artifacts then you can force video by:

GreedyHMA(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)

- Tom

ipfreak
19th December 2001, 12:38
What about the build in deinterlacer of mpeg2aviSVE ???

Isn't it that good ?

EvilFoo
21st December 2001, 16:36
Haha... I remember people were having problems with porn movies when everyone was using 3.11 (not the interlacing, but just problems with quality) and I would tell them: Just encode it with Fast motion, I don't think Low Motion can keep up with all the action and c** flying around...