SAPSTAR
13th April 2006, 21:58
hi,
I would like to have a small explanation (if possible) on the algo used by DVDRB to find the proper Q value in OPV. Because I found it a bit "strange" :
- Overall Bitrate : 2,914/2,331Kbs
- Space for Video : 3,377,788KB
- Analyzing VTS_01 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):221,075
-- Sampling 1500 of 49968 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=58: 219,843
- Q Value selected: 58
- Analyzing VTS_03 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):84,141
-- Sampling 675 of 22225 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=68: 74,774
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=56: 124,940
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=96: 60,322
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=46: 184,422
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=125: 57,923
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=41: 215,977
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=133: 49,460
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=10: 332,887
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=50: 160,067
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=116: 59,130
- Q Value selected: 68
- Analyzing VTS_06 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):21,396
-- Sampling 165 of 5054 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=60: 18,851
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=49: 30,804
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=80: 11,109
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=15: 69,239
For the VTS_03, I would have expected it to try some values between 68 and 56, because 56 is too big and 68 too small...so why is it trying values outside this range?! Then same thing for the VTS_06.....
It's like if it doesn't keep a track of the previous attempts but just the last one ?!
I would like to have a small explanation (if possible) on the algo used by DVDRB to find the proper Q value in OPV. Because I found it a bit "strange" :
- Overall Bitrate : 2,914/2,331Kbs
- Space for Video : 3,377,788KB
- Analyzing VTS_01 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):221,075
-- Sampling 1500 of 49968 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=58: 219,843
- Q Value selected: 58
- Analyzing VTS_03 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):84,141
-- Sampling 675 of 22225 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=68: 74,774
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=56: 124,940
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=96: 60,322
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=46: 184,422
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=125: 57,923
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=41: 215,977
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=133: 49,460
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=10: 332,887
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=50: 160,067
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=116: 59,130
- Q Value selected: 68
- Analyzing VTS_06 for optimal Q factor.
-- TargetSize (sectors):21,396
-- Sampling 165 of 5054 frames.
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=60: 18,851
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=49: 30,804
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=80: 11,109
-- Predicted size (sectors) at Q=15: 69,239
For the VTS_03, I would have expected it to try some values between 68 and 56, because 56 is too big and 68 too small...so why is it trying values outside this range?! Then same thing for the VTS_06.....
It's like if it doesn't keep a track of the previous attempts but just the last one ?!