PDA

View Full Version : Support DMCA Reform: Help pass HR 1201


Schrade
20th March 2006, 22:40
The link below takes you to a page on the Electronic Frontier Foundation that will allow you to fill out and send a form to your represenative (if you live in the United States) Please, everyone that qualifies help to do this!

Support DMCA Reform - Help Pass HR 1201! (http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=115)
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) has been wreaking havoc on consumers' fair use rights for the past seven years. Now Congress is considering the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act (DMCRA, HR 1201), a bill that would reform part of the DMCA and formally protect the "Betamax defense" relied on by so many innovators.

HR 1201 would give citizens the right to circumvent copy-protection measures as long as what they're doing is otherwise legal. For example, it would make sure that when you buy a CD, whether it is copy-protected or not, you can record it onto your computer and move the songs to an MP3 player. It would also protect a computer science professor who needs to bypass copy-protection to evaluate encryption technology. In addition, the bill would codify the Betamax defense, which has been under attack by the entertainment industries in the "INDUCE Act" and the MGM v. Grokster case. This kind of sanity would be a welcome change to our copyright law.

Last year we sent 30,000+ letters of support for the DMCRA, and the bill got a hearing on Capitol Hill. It's time to double that number - take action at the link below, then urge your friends and family to support HR 1201, too!

Zarxrax
21st March 2006, 00:05
Yep. This thing is a little old, but you have to keep it going. I wish the eff would update their page on it though so we know whats going on.

adam
21st March 2006, 08:53
You can follow the bill here:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR01201:@@@X

Its currently in the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection where it seems to be just sitting. The last reported actions I can find took place back in 2004 before it was even referred to a subcommittee. You can check for updates in the subcommitte here:

http://energycommerce.house.gov/

But I did see that a MAJOR coalition of big media companies and representatives (RIAA, MPAA, BSA) filed a joint response to the bill just a couple months ago. Their argument was basically that the amendments are not necessarily bad but that they just aren't needed. There is a high burden of proof required to "clarify" existing legislation.