Eyael
20th December 2005, 18:05
Could anyone be kind enough in explaining how you can tell the difference (I mean visually) between interlaced and non interlaced video sources?
I've tried to encode a PAL interlaced DVD (not a TV movie) as if it were a progressive source and the result was OK (not perfect, just okay and I've used a 905kB/s bitrate).
Then I've set the Desinterlace filter in ffdshow video decoder to see if it would produce a difference, but I could not see any. So my question is was the source truly interlaced? GSpot says it is and so does DGIndex (I've tried VOBs without the logo). So how can you really tell?
And when a source is truly interlaced, which desinterlacing method should I use before encoding : GordianKnot's filters or XviD's interlaced encoding mode?
A million thanks for letting me know.
I've tried to encode a PAL interlaced DVD (not a TV movie) as if it were a progressive source and the result was OK (not perfect, just okay and I've used a 905kB/s bitrate).
Then I've set the Desinterlace filter in ffdshow video decoder to see if it would produce a difference, but I could not see any. So my question is was the source truly interlaced? GSpot says it is and so does DGIndex (I've tried VOBs without the logo). So how can you really tell?
And when a source is truly interlaced, which desinterlacing method should I use before encoding : GordianKnot's filters or XviD's interlaced encoding mode?
A million thanks for letting me know.