View Full Version : Power Needed for Playback
chucktx
15th September 2005, 17:57
I've read what people have to encode H.264 files but my question what is needed to play them back? I have a 2.4 GHz P4HT w/ 1.5 GB RAM to encode the files. I have been until now happily using an old P3 800 w/ 512MB RAM as the computer for file playback to the HT. Am I going to need to upgrade this or can I get away with simply cretaing larger (less complex) H.264 files that will be able to play on this machine. I would like to keep using the machine for this purpose and this may cause me to wait to start dopting H.264 for my personal backups. Any info is appreciated.
IRMA1024
15th September 2005, 18:31
i had x264 movie encoded with 640x352 res, 2b-frame, 4ref-frame, CABAC, deblock 0:0, --analyse-all, 8x8, umh, me-range 16 , MP3 audio codec 128kbps, mkv container
played on Pentium III 450 Mhz, 256 MB sys mem. 4 MB onboard SiS VGA , and i got smooth playback on 100% view but a little droped frame on fullscreen, using Media Player Classic and ffdshow decoder.
zhangtrinity
15th September 2005, 18:59
My old IBM t23 with a P3 1.13GHz & 768 MB RAM just can not handle the MP4 file playback, no matter how hard I push it. So here I suggest you to grab a P4 pc or a 1.65GHz PowerBook, both can play H.264 Movies at 50% CPU usage. Cheers.
movax
15th September 2005, 20:00
I think it's generally agreed that anything below a P3 (which is borderline) will be insufficient for H264, and that a Willamette P4 or above is recommended IIRC.
acidsex
15th September 2005, 20:28
Anyone have any idea what the minimum is for H.264 AVC with HDTV resolutions? My P4 2.4Ghz chokes on 1080i big time and is hit and miss with 720p.
nm
15th September 2005, 20:34
I think it's generally agreed that anything below a P3 (which is borderline) will be insufficient for H264, and that a Willamette P4 or above is recommended IIRC.
Perhaps for full DVD resolutions and up. For 640x360 at 30 fps and below, a 600 MHz P3 is just fine. Also see bond's decoder comparison (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=99402), where AFAIK a P3 866MHz was used to measure the fps values. Of course, the results don't include delays that actual video playback on the graphics card may cause, but with a good card that should not be a big problem. For maximum performance you could also try mplayer.
In any case, it's best to just try it out yourself with a couple of test encodes. With the GUI tools and binary builds it really isn't too hard.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.